U.S. Code » Title 20 » Chapter CHAPTER 70— STRENGTHENING AND IMPROVEMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS AND IMMIGRANT STUDENTS › Part Part A— English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act › Subpart subpart 2— accountability and administration

20 U.S.C. § 6842

Repealed. Pub. L. 114–95, title III, § 3001(2)(A), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1953

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2008–2015 · leading case: Horne v. Flores
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Horne v. Flores (2009) scotus · cites it 3× “1702 , as added, 20 U. S. C. §6842 et seq., constituted a changed legal circumstance that war ranted Rule 60(b)(5) relief.”
Flores Ex Rel. Flores v. Arizona (2008) ca9 · cites it 3× “21 See 20 U.S.C. § 6842 (federal standards). These test results must be viewed with two significant caveats: First, because AIMS testing was not carried out in 2000, we do not know whether the performance of ELL students has improved relative to that time.”
Miriam Flores v. John Huppenthal (2015) ca9 · cites it 2× “1702 , as added, 20 U.S.C. § 6842 et seq., the district court extended its original declaratory judgment statewide, “even though the certified class included only Nogales students and parents and even though the court did not find that any districts other than Nogales were in…”
Flores v. Horne (2008) ca9 · cites it 3× “21 See 20 U.S.C. § 6842 (federal standards). These test results must be viewed with two significant caveats: First, because AIMS testing was not carried out in 2000, we do not know whether the performance of ELL stu- dents has improved relative to that time.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.