U.S. Code » Title 21 » Chapter CHAPTER 24— INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS TRAFFICKING

21 U.S.C. § 1902

Purpose

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 21 CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this chapter is to provide authority for the identification of, and application of sanctions on a worldwide basis to, significant foreign narcotics traffickers, their organizations, and the foreign persons who provide support to those significant foreign narcotics traffickers and their organizations, whose activities threaten the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2014–2024 · leading case: Zevallos v. Obama, 10 F. Supp. 3d 111 (D.D.C. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Zevallos v. Obama, 10 F. Supp. 3d 111 (D.D.C. 2014). “” 21 U.S.C. § 1902 . The Kingpin Act authorizes the President to “identify!] publicly the foreign persons that the President determines are appropriate for sanctions .”
Samark Lopez Bello v. Andrea Gacki, 94 F.4th 1067 (D.C. Cir. 2024). “” 21 U.S.C. § 1902 . The Act’s “bottom line objective .”
Versilia Supply Serv. SRL v. M/Y Waku, 371 F. Supp. 3d 1143 (S.D. Fla. 2019). “" 21 U.S.C. § 1902 . The Kingpin Act authorizes the designation of foreign persons that "play[ ] a significant role in international narcotics trafficking," id.”
Sulemane v. Lew (D.D.C. 2019). ““Narcotics trafficking” means “any illicit activity to cultivate, produce, manufacture, distribute, sell, finance, or transport narcotic drugs, controlled 1 In considering these motions, the Court considered all relevant filings including, but not limited to, the following:…”
Lopez Bello v. Smith (D.D.C. 2022). “21 U.S.C. § 1902 . The Kingpin Act authorizes the President to designate “foreign person[s] that play[] a significant role in international narcotics trafficking” as “significant foreign narcotics traffickers.”
John Doe v. United States Attorney's Off. (S.D.N.Y. 2023). “” 21 U.S.C. § 1902 . The Act criminalizes conduct that violates any of the Act’s provisions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.