U.S. Code » Title 21 » Chapter CHAPTER 26— FOOD SAFETY

21 U.S.C. § 2107

Sense of Congress

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 21 CasesGoogle Scholar
It is the sense of Congress that—(1) it is vital for Congress to provide the Food and Drug Administration with additional resources, authorities, and direction with respect to ensuring the safety of the food supply of the United States;(2) additional inspectors are required to improve the Food and Drug Administration’s ability to safeguard the food supply of the United States;(3) because of the increasing volume of international trade in food products the Secretary should make it a priority to enter into agreements with the trading partners of the United States with respect to food safety; and(4) Congress should work to develop a comprehensive response to the issue of food safety.(Pub. L. 110–85, title X, § 1008, Sept. 27, 2007, 121 Stat. 970.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2009–2012 · leading case: Emann v. Latture, 605 F.3d 830 (10th Cir. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Emann v. Latture, 605 F.3d 830 (10th Cir. 2010). “4(a)’s time limit for filing a notice of appeal in a civil case derives from 21 U.S.C. § 2107 . Id. The Tenth Circuit B.”
Obaydullah v. Barack Obama, 688 F.3d 784 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “2009), which, relying on the Supreme Court’s (unrelated) Bowles, held that a claim-processing rule cannot be used to circumvent the jurisdictional time limit of 21 U.S.C. § 2107 (a). In re Sealed Case (Bowles), 624 F.”
Taylor v. Taylor, 343 F. App'x 753 (3rd Cir. 2009). “4(a)(l)(A)’s time limit for filing a notice of appeal from a District Court order is set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 2107 ) — a factor that the Supreme Court stated counsels in favor of holding the rule to be jurisdictional, see Bowles, 551 U.”
Taylor v. Taylor, 343 F. App'x 753 (3rd Cir. 2009). “4(a)(l)(A)’s time limit for filing a notice of appeal from a District Court order is set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 2107 ) — a factor that the Supreme Court stated counsels in favor of holding the rule to be jurisdictional, see Bowles, 551 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.