22 U.S.C. § 1631

Definitions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 22 CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in this subchapter the term—(1) “Person” means a natural person, partnership, association, other unincorporated body, corporation, or body politic.(2) “Property” means any property, right, or interest.(3) “Treaty of peace”, with respect to a country, means the treaty of peace with that country signed at Paris, France, February 10, 1947, which came into force between that country and the United States on September 15, 1947.(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title II, § 201, as added Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 645, § 3, 69 Stat. 562.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1958–1973 · leading case: Ghitescu v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 823 (Ct. Cl. 1973).
Ghitescu v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 823 (Ct. Cl. 1973). · cites it 2× “562 , 22 U.S.C. §§ 1631 -1631n (1970), under which Rumanian Government and corporate property was vested and the proceeds paid into a Rumanian Claims Fund in the Treasury for the satisfaction of the claims of United States citizens for Rumanian nationalization and for war damage.”
Roboz v. Kennedy, 219 F. Supp. 892 (D.D.C. 1963). · cites it 2× “This is a suit for the return of property vested in the Attorney General under the International Claims Settlement Act, as amended in 1955 to deal with Bulgaria, Hungary, and Rumania, 22 U.S.C. § 1631 . The suit is brought pursuant to § 1631f(a), which provides that any person…”
Chem. Bank New York Trust Co. v. Kennedy, 199 F. Supp. 256 (D.D.C. 1961). “This action is brought by alleged creditors of the National Bank of Hungary, against the Attorney General of the United States, to secure payment of their indebtedness out of property seized by the Attorney General under the provisions of the International Claims Settlement Act,…”
Kuerschner & Rauchwarenfabrik, A.G. v. New York Trust Co., 162 F. Supp. 481 (S.D.N.Y. 1958). “562 ), 22 U.S. C.A. § 1631 et seq. If the balance in the account of the plaintiff has been vested by the Attorney General, then obviously the plaintiff no longer has a claim against the bank for that balance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.