22 U.S.C. § 1631
Definitions
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1958–1973 · leading case: Ghitescu v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 823 (Ct. Cl. 1973).
Ghitescu v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 823 (Ct. Cl. 1973). “562 , 22 U.S.C. §§ 1631 -1631n (1970), under which Rumanian Government and corporate property was vested and the proceeds paid into a Rumanian Claims Fund in the Treasury for the satisfaction of the claims of United States citizens for Rumanian nationalization and for war damage.”
Roboz v. Kennedy, 219 F. Supp. 892 (D.D.C. 1963). “This is a suit for the return of property vested in the Attorney General under the International Claims Settlement Act, as amended in 1955 to deal with Bulgaria, Hungary, and Rumania, 22 U.S.C. § 1631 . The suit is brought pursuant to § 1631f(a), which provides that any person…”
Chem. Bank New York Trust Co. v. Kennedy, 199 F. Supp. 256 (D.D.C. 1961). “This action is brought by alleged creditors of the National Bank of Hungary, against the Attorney General of the United States, to secure payment of their indebtedness out of property seized by the Attorney General under the provisions of the International Claims Settlement Act,…”
Kuerschner & Rauchwarenfabrik, A.G. v. New York Trust Co., 162 F. Supp. 481 (S.D.N.Y. 1958). “562 ), 22 U.S. C.A. § 1631 et seq. If the balance in the account of the plaintiff has been vested by the Attorney General, then obviously the plaintiff no longer has a claim against the bank for that balance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.