22 U.S.C. § 1650
Appointments of representatives and panel members under Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes
The President may make such appointments of representatives and panel members as may be provided for under the convention.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Mar. Int'l Nominees Establishment v. The Repub. of Guinea, United States of Am., Intervenor, 693 F.2d 1094 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Mar. Int'l Nominees Establishment v. The Repub. of Guinea, United States of Am., Intervenor, 693 F.2d 1094 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “Under the Convention, which has been implemented by legislation in the United States, 22 U.S.C. §§ 1650 -1650a (1976), ICSID has “full international legal personality,” Convention art.”
Micula v. Gov't of Romania, The, 104 F. Supp. 3d 42 (D.D.C. 2015). “334 (1966) (codified at 22 U.S.C. §§ 1650 and 1650a).. Section 3 of the Investment Disputes Act, codified at ■22 U.”
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Eur. v. Bolivarian Rep. of Venezuela, 23 F.4th 1036 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “When the Republic failed to pay the award, Saint-Gobain in December 2018 filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware seeking to register and enforce the arbitral award pursuant to the ICSID Convention, specifically 22 U.S.C. § 1650 (a), which…”
Micula v. Gov't of Romania (D.D.C. 2019). “334 (1966) (codified at 22 U.S.C. §§ 1650 and 1650a). Section 3 of the Act addresses the enforcement of ICSID arbitration awards in the United States.”
Teco Guatemala Holdings, LLC v. Repub. of Guatemala (D.D.C. 2019). “334 (codified at 22 U.S.C. §§ 1650 and 1650a) (the treaty’s implementing statute).”
Union Fenosa Gas, S.A. v. Arab Repub. of Egypt (D.D.C. 2020). “Accordingly, 22 U.S.C. § 1650 (a) – the enabling statue for United States participation in the ICSID Convention – provides: An award of an arbitral tribunal rendered pursuant to chapter IV of the convention shall create a right arising under a treaty of the United States.”
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Eur. v. Bolivarian Repub. of Venezuela (D.D.C. 2021). “District of Court for the District of Delaware seeking registration of the award as a Foreign Judgment and enforcement of the award pursuant to 22 U.S.C. § 1650 (a). See Compl. ¶¶ 30–38.”
Tenaris S.A. v. Bolivarian Repub. of Venezuela (D.D.C. 2021). “That is because doing so may violate the ICSID’s implementing statute, 22 U.S.C. § 1650 (a), which provides that “[t]he pecuniary obligations imposed by such an award shall be enforced and shall be given the same full faith and credit as if the award were a final judgment of a…”
Valores Mundiales, S.L. v. Bolivarian Repub. of Venezuela (D.D.C. 2023). “334 (1966) (codified at 22 U.S.C. §§ 1650 and 1650a). This legislation confers exclusive jurisdiction on the federal district courts to enter awards, see 22 U.”
Infrared Env't Infrastructure Gp Ltd. v. Kingdom of Spain (D.D.C. 2025). “The Act implemented the Convention by granting awardees “a right arising under a treaty of the United States” and vesting federal courts with exclusive jurisdiction over actions under the statute.”
Micula v. Gov't of Romania, The (D.D.C. 2015). “334 (1966) (codified at 22 U.S.C. §§ 1650 and 1650a). Section 3 of the Investment Disputes Act, codified at 22 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.