U.S. Code » Title 22 » Chapter CHAPTER 48— TAIWAN RELATIONS

22 U.S.C. § 3306

Services to United States citizens on Taiwan

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 22 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Authorized servicesThe Institute may authorize any of its employees on Taiwan—(1) to administer to or take from any person an oath, affirmation, affidavit, or deposition, and to perform any notarial act which any notary public is required or authorized by law to perform within the United States;(2) To 11 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized. act as provisional conservator of the personal estates of deceased United States citizens; and(3) to assist and protect the interests of United States persons by performing other acts such as are authorized to be performed outside the United States for consular purposes by such laws of the United States as the President may specify.(b) Acts by authorized employees

Acts performed by authorized employees of the Institute under this section shall be valid, and of like force and effect within the United States, as if performed by any other person authorized under the laws of the United States to perform such acts.

(Pub. L. 96–8, § 7, Apr. 10, 1979, 93 Stat. 17.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective as of January 1, 1979, see section 18 of Pub. L. 96–8, set out as a note under section 3301 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1980–2002 · leading case: Wood ex rel. United States v. Am. Inst. in Taiwan, 286 F.3d 526 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wood ex rel. United States v. Am. Inst. in Taiwan, 286 F.3d 526 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “” 22 U.S.C. § 3306 (a)(3), (b). Put simply, though not an embassy, the Institute functions like one.”
Chang v. Nw. Mem'l Hosp., 506 F. Supp. 975 (N.D. Ill. 1980). “17 , 22 U.S.C. § 3306 . Thus, not only are private commercial relations with Taiwan permitted, but quasi-govemmental relations under the auspices of this Institute are provided for by the Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.