22 U.S.C. § 405

INADMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN ALIENS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 22 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Ineligibility for Visas.—An alien is ineligible to receive a visa to enter the United States and ineligible to be admitted to the United States if the alien is on the list required by section 404(a).“(b)Current Visas Revoked.—The Secretary of State shall revoke, in accordance with section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1201(i)), the visa or other documentation of any alien who would be ineligible to receive such a visa or documentation under subsection (a) of this section.“(c)Waiver for National Security Interests.—“(1)In general.—The Secretary of State may waive the application of subsection (a) or (b) in the case of an alien if—“(A) the Secretary determines that such a waiver—“(i) is necessary to permit the United States to comply with the Agreement between the United Nations and the United States of America regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, or other applicable international obligations of the United States; or“(ii) is in the national security interests of the United States; and“(B) prior to granting such a waiver, the Secretary provides to the appropriate congressional committees notice of, and a justification for, the waiver.“(2)Timing for certain waivers.—Notification under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) shall be made not later than 15 days prior to granting a waiver under such paragraph if the Secretary grants such waiver in the national security interests of the United States in accordance with subparagraph (A)(ii) of such paragraph.“(d)Regulatory Authority.—The Secretary of State shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1946–1947 · leading case: United States v. Morachis
United States v. Morachis (1946) ca9 “This view is confirmed by Section 5 of the same Act, 22 U.S.C.A. § 405 , providing for the conditions of the bond on release of the “property seized” which includes the' automobile.”
One Plymouth Automobile v. United States (1947) ca5 “He has not had the trial by jury which he demanded.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.