22 U.S.C. § 4107
Functions of Foreign Service Labor Relations Board
Decisions of the Board under this subchapter shall be consistent with decisions rendered by the Authority under chapter 71 of title 5, other than in cases in which the Board finds that special circumstances require otherwise. Decisions of the Board under this subchapter shall not be construed as precedent by the Authority, or any court or other authority, for any decision under chapter 71 of title 5.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Walter F. Costello v. Agency for Int'l Dev., 843 F.2d 540 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Walter F. Costello v. Agency for Int'l Dev., 843 F.2d 540 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “8, was mistaken in believing that the Board had residual authority to take such remedial action under section 1007(c)(2)(E), 22 U.S.C. § 4107 (c)(2)(E). That section deals with the competencies of the Foreign Service Labor Relations Board, not the Foreign Service Grievance Board.”
Am. Foreign Serv. Ass'n v. James A. Baker, Iii, Sec'y of State, 895 F.2d 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1990). “See 22 U.S.C. § 4107 (c)(2)(E). AFSA contends that the Board could only order the Department to bargain and could not enjoin the Department to reinstate the cancelled subsidy.”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Trump (D.D.C. 2025). “And plaintiffs’ objection that the FSA’s grievance procedures are too “individualized” to address “mass placements on administrative leave” fails to grapple with the fact that the FSLRB is expressly designed to handle union complaints of the sort that plaintiffs have brought…”
Radio Free Asia v. USA (D.C. Cir. 2025). “§ 7104 (Federal Labor Relations Authority); 22 U.S.C. § 4107 (Foreign Service Labor Relations Board); id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.