22 U.S.C. § 4307
Preemption
Notwithstanding any other law, no act of any Federal agency shall be effective to confer or deny any benefit with respect to any foreign mission contrary to this chapter. Nothing in section 4302, 4303, 4304, or 4305 of this title may be construed to preempt any State or municipal law or governmental authority regarding zoning, land use, health, safety, or welfare, except that a denial by the Secretary involving a benefit for a foreign mission within the jurisdiction of a particular State or local government shall be controlling.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1987–2010 · leading case: City of New York v. Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations
City of New York v. Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations (2010)
“ention that section 4307 — which provides that nothing in the FMA “may be construed to preempt any State or municipal law or governmental authority regard *188 ing zoning, land use, health, safety, or welfare, except that a denial by the Secre tary involving a benefit for a…”
Embassy of the People's Republic of Benin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (1987)
“See 22 U.S. C.A. § 4307; D.C.Code § 5-1207. Further evidence of the Congress’ intent that the provisions of the FMA should exclusively govern the location and expansion of chanceries in the District may be drawn from the “Technical and Conforming Amendments” of the FMA.”
Sheridan Kalorama Historical Ass'n v. Christopher (1995)
“Section 207 of the FMA, 22 U.S.C. § 4307 , provides: “Nothing in section 4302, 4303, 4304, or 4305 of this title may be construed to preempt any State or municipal law of governmental authority regarding zoning, land use, health, safety, or welfare.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.