22 U.S.C. § 5001

Repealed. Pub. L. 103–149, § 4(a)(2), Nov. 23, 1993, 107 Stat. 1505

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 22 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1988–2009 · leading case: In Re South African Apartheid Litig., 617 F. Supp. 2d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
In Re South African Apartheid Litig., 617 F. Supp. 2d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 5011 , repealed by South African Democratic Transition Support Act of 1993, 22 U.S.C. § 5001 note (describing apartheid policies that the United States directly opposed).”
United States v. Thomas P. Jasin, 280 F.3d 355 (3rd Cir. 2002). “§ 2778 , the Comprehensive Anti Apartheid Act, 22 U.S.C. §§ 5001 et seq., and various provisions of the federal money laundering statutes, 18 U.”
United States v. Jasin, 292 F. Supp. 2d 670 (E.D. Pa. 2003). “and the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986 (“CAAA”), 22 U.S.C. § 5001 et seq. The three prongs of the conspiracy were “.”
Congressman Ronald v. Dellums v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n & United States of Am., Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corp., Intervenors, 863 F.2d 968 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “ners, which include several members of Congress, 1 three organizations opposed to apartheid and one concerned with nuclear proliferation, 2 an exiled black South African anti-apartheid activist named Henry Isaacs, and an unemployed American uranium miner named Robert Chavez, 3…”
United States v. Jasin, 215 F. Supp. 2d 552 (E.D. Pa. 2002). “(“AECA”); the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, 22 U.S.C. § 5001 , et seq. (“CAAA”); and sections of a money laundering statute, 18 U.”
United States v. Eleven Vehs., 898 F. Supp. 1143 (E.D. Pa. 1995). “1995); Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, 22 U.S.C. § 5001 & note (West 1990 & Supp.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Arabian Am. Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244 (1991). · cites it 2× “§ 1701 (Customs enforcement on the high seas); Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, 22 U. S. C. § 5001 (5)(A) (definition of "national of the United States" as "a natural person who is a citizen of the United States .”
Ntsebeza v. Daimler AG, 617 F. Supp. 2d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 5011 , repealed by South African Democratic Transition Support Act of 1993, 22 U.S.C. § 5001 note (describing apartheid policies that the United States directly opposed).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.