25 U.S.C. § 1707

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2003–2007 · leading case: Carcieri v. Norton
Carcieri v. Norton (2005) ca1 · cites it 3× “§ 1707 (Purchase and transfer of private Settlement Lands) — provides for the ratification of various transfers of land and natural resources, extinguishment of aboriginal title, state jurisdiction over the Settlement Lands, and a limit on the duties and liabilities of the…”
Carcieri v. Norton (2003) rid · cites it 4× “15 Second, plaintiffs contend that 25 U.S.C. § 1707 (c) specifically extinguished the federal government’s authority to acquire additional, non-settlement lands in trust for the benefit of the tribe pursuant to § 465.”
Carcieri v. Kempthorne (2005) ca1 “15 The State also relies on 25 U.S.C. § 1707 (c), which provides: Upon the discharge of the Secretary’s duties under sections 1704, 1705, 1706, and 1707 of this title, the United States shall have no further duties or liabilities under this subchapter with respect to the Indian…”
Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island v. Rhode Island (2003) rid · cites it 2× “These amendments were contingent upon the Narra-gansetts obtaining federal recognition as an Indian tribe pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 1707 and 25 C.F.R. § 83 . Once the Tribe attained this status, the State Corporation would cease to exist and the Settlement Lands would be…”
Carcieri v. Kempthorne (2007) ca1 “[15] The State also relies on 25 U.S.C. § 1707 (c), which provides: Upon the discharge of the Secretary's duties under sections 1704, 1705, 1706, and 1707 of this title, the United States shall have no further duties or liabilities under this subchapter with respect to the…”
Carcieri v. Kempthorne (2005) ca1 “§ 1712 (Approval of prior transfers and extinguishment of claims and aboriginal title outside town of Charlestown), and 25 U.S.C. § 1707 (Purchase and transfer of private Settlement Lands) -- provides for the ratification of various transfers of land and natural resources,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.