25 U.S.C. § 1779
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2005–2009 · leading case: United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma v. United States v. The Cherokee Nation, 480 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma v. United States v. The Cherokee Nation, 480 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “2845 (2002) (codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 1779 -1779g) (“Settlement Act” or “Act”).”
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. United States, 67 Fed. Cl. 695 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “2845 (2002) (codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 1779 -1779g) (“Settlement Act” or “Act”).”
Wolfchild v. United States, 77 Fed. Cl. 22 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “2845 (2002) (codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 1779 -1779g) (“Settlement Act”), under which the United States paid $40 million in compensation to three Indian tribes—the Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw Nations (“settling tribes”)—to resolve claims that the United States had mismanaged…”
United Keetoowah Band v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 303 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “2845 (2002) (codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 1779 -1779g) (“Settlement Act”), which was enacted following litigation by three Indian tribes alleging that the government had mismanaged portions of the Arkansas Riverbed that were held in trust for the tribes.”
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. Kempthorne, 630 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (E.D. Okla. 2009). “The UKB brought a statutory claim under an independent section of the Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw Nations Claims Settlement Act ("Settlement Act”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1779 -1779g, that provides a right for the UKB and other specified Tribes to sue the United States over claims…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.