25 U.S.C. § 196
Sale or other disposition of dead timber
The President of the United States may from year to year in his discretion under such regulations as he may prescribe authorize the Indians residing on reservations or allotments, the fee to which remains in the United States, to fell, cut, remove, sell or otherwise dispose of the dead timber standing, or fallen, on such reservation or allotment for the sole benefit of such Indian or Indians. But whenever there is reasonable cause to believe that such timber has been killed, burned, girdled, or otherwise injured for the purpose of securing its sale under this section then in that case such authority shall not be granted.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1973–1999 · leading case: White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker (1980)
“" See 25 U. S. C. § 196 ; United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.”
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States (1986)
“673 , 25 U.S.C. § 196 (1983). The 1889 Act stated in pertinent part: That the President of the United States may from year to year in his discretion under such regulations as he may prescribe authorize the Indians residing on reservations or allotments, the fee to which remains…”
Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation v. United States (1999)
“The terms to be defined were: (a) Annual Allowable Cut (AAC); (b) Gross AAC; (c) Net AAC; (d) Minimum Annual Cut; (e) "q” value and “q” ratio; (f) Basal Area; (g) Stocking Area; (h) Tribal Enterprise; (i) Uneven Age Management; (j) Even Age Management; (k) Managed Growth; (/)…”
United States v. Ross William Montgomery and Gordon Montgomery (1973)
“Aboriginal title is not exempted and defendants have not cited relevant authority to support their contention that it is a right or privilege within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1852 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.