Congress declares that the Federal Government has the sole responsibility for the operation and financial support of the Bureau of Indian Affairs funded school system that it has established on or near Indian reservations and Indian trust lands throughout the Nation for Indian children. It is the policy of the United States to fulfill the Federal Government’s unique and continuing trust relationship with and responsibility to the Indian people for the education of Indian children and for the operation and financial support of the Bureau of Indian Affairs-funded school system to work in full cooperation with tribes toward the goal of ensuring that the programs of the Bureau of Indian Affairs-funded school system are of the highest quality and provide for the basic elementary and secondary educational needs of Indian children, including meeting the unique educational and cultural needs of those children.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2021 · leading case:
Brackeen v. Haaland, 994 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2021).
Brackeen v. Haaland, 994 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2021).
“, 25 U.S.C. § 2000 (“It is the policy of the United States to fulfill the Federal Government’s unique and continuing trust relationship with and responsibility to the Indian people for the education of Indian children .”
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Kempthorne, 442 F. Supp. 2d 774 (D.S.D. 2006).
“” 25 U.S.C. § 2000 (emphasis added). The BIA must engage in active consultation with the tribes in matters related to Indian schools.”
Applicability of Section 504 of the Rehab. Act to Tribally Controlled Schs. (OLC 2004).
· cites it 2× “§ 6316 (g)(4) (West 2003) (corrective action must “take into account the unique circumstances and structure of the Bureau of Indian Affairs-funded school system”); 25 U.S.C.A. § 2000 (West Supp. 2003) (acknowledging federal Government responsibility for the “Bureau of Indian…”
Burt Lake Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. Zinke (D.D.C. 2020).
“§ 305 (a); 25 U.S.C. § 2000 . Plaintiff notes that “[e]ven the Preamble to the revised Part 83 regulations that DOI implemented in 2015 state that they were made ‘for the benefit of Indian tribes.”
Nally v. Graham (D. Kan. 2021).
“”52 Defendant further notes that Congress enacted the Haskell Indian Nations University and Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute Administrative Systems Act of 1998, which authorized HINU to implement demonstration projects aimed at improving personnel management policies…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.