25 U.S.C. § 27
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2000–2016 · leading case: Stand up for California v. State of Cal., 6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
Stand up for California v. State of Cal., 6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “§§ 1166-1167 ; 25 U.S.C. § 27 of et seq.) wholly bans class III gaming on Indian lands in states which do not permit such gaming “by any person, organization, or entity.”
Bell Atl.-Delaware, Inc. v. McMahon, 80 F. Supp. 2d 218 (D. Del. 2000). “' ”) (quoting IGRA, 25 U.S.C. § 27 (d)(17)(B)(iii)). 10 . AT & T argues that this law is an explicit waiver of the state's sovereign immunity.”
Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation, 478 F. Supp. 2d 1093 (W.D. Wis. 2007). “Here, the Court would have jurisdiction over a suit by the tribe in accordance with 25 U.S.C. § 27 10(d)(7)(A)(l), an action which the Tribe has previously threatened.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.