25 U.S.C. § 284
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2015–2025 · leading case: Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobility
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobility (2015)
“Specifically, Motorola cites to the damages provision of the Patent Act, 25 U.S.C. § 284 , which provides that a court shall award damages “adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty rate for the use made of the invention by the…”
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Last Brand, Inc. (2024)
“See 25 U.S.C. § 284 ; In re MSTG, Inc., 675 22 F.”
BTL Industries, Inc. v. Bioskin Laser LLC (2024)
“) On April 30, 2024, BTL filed its Proposed Findings, seeking (i) an award of $76,230 in lost profits damages as a remedy for the Defaulted Defendants' patent infringement, trebled to $228,690 for willfulness in accordance with 25 U.S.C. § 284 , see Prop. Findings ¶¶ 28-30; (ii)…”
SmartSky Networks, LLC v. Gogo Business Aviation LLC and Gogo Inc. (2025)
“ANALYSIS 25 U.S.C. § 284 guarantees a patent holder damages “adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.