25 U.S.C. § 284
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2015–2025 · leading case: Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Mobility, 795 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2015).
Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Mobility, 795 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2015). “Specifically, Motorola cites to the damages provision of the Patent Act, 25 U.S.C. § 284 , which provides that a court shall award damages “adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty rate for the use made of the invention by the…”
Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Last Brand, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2024). “See 25 U.S.C. § 284 ; In re MSTG, Inc., 675 22 F.”
BTL Indus., Inc. v. Bioskin Laser LLC (S.D.N.Y. 2024). “) On April 30, 2024, BTL filed its Proposed Findings, seeking (i) an award of $76,230 in lost profits damages as a remedy for the Defaulted Defendants' patent infringement, trebled to $228,690 for willfulness in accordance with 25 U.S.C. § 284 , see Prop. Findings ¶¶ 28-30; (ii)…”
SmartSky Networks, LLC v. Gogo Bus. Aviation LLC & Gogo Inc. (D. Del. 2025). “ANALYSIS 25 U.S.C. § 284 guarantees a patent holder damages “adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.