25 U.S.C. § 318a

Roads on Indian reservations; appropriation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

Appropriations are hereby authorized out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated for material, equipment, supervision and engineering, and the employment of Indian labor in the survey, improvement, construction, and maintenance of Indian reservation roads not eligible to Government aid under the Federal Highway Act and for which no other appropriation is available, under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Secertary 11 So in original. Probably should be “Secretary”. of the Interior.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1979–2020 · leading case: United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206 (1983).
United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206 (1983). · cites it 2× “750 , 25 U. S. C. § 318a (road building). [26] Rights-of-way over lands of individual Indians may be granted without the consent of the owners under certain specific circumstances.”
United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535 (1980). · cites it 2× “§ 162a (investment of funds of tribe and individual allottee); 25 U. S. C. §§ 318a, 323-325 (roads and rights-of-way); 25 U.”
Mitchell v. United States, 229 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1981). · cites it 4× “§466 (1976) (regulations and sustained yield); and 25 U.S.C. §§318a, 323-325 (1976) (rights-of-way).”
Fourstar v. United States, 950 F.3d 856 (Fed. Cir. 2020). “…funds and government fees, and regulations promulgated under their money-mandating statutes 25 U.S.C. §§ 406 , 407 & 25 U.S.C. §§ 318a, 323–325; 25 U.S.C. §§ 162a, 413, respectively. Complaint at 3. The Court of Federal Claims denied his motion to proceed in forma pauperis on…”
Mitchell v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 95 (Ct. Cl. 1979). “§§ 349 and 372 (1976) (issuance of fee patents to allottees or heirs found to be competent and capable of managing their affairs); 25 U.S.C. §§ 318a, 323-25 (1976) (concerning roads and rights of way); 25 U.”
Navajo Nation v. United States, 347 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2003). “§ 466 regulations and sustained yield; and 25 U.S.C. §§ 318a and 323-325 regulating rights-of-way.”
Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United States, 364 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “§ 466 (requiring sustainable yield harvesting); 25 U.S.C. § 318a (authorizing the appropriation of money for reservation roads).”
Short v. United States, 25 Cl. Ct. 722 (Ct. Cl. 1992). “The court in considering the interest issue stated that “[t]he proceeds actually paid to plaintiffs under [25 U.S.C. §§ 318a, 323-325, 406-407, 466] obviously should include interest which should have been earned or allowed on those underlying proceeds.”
Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Supron Energy Corp., 782 F.2d 855 (10th Cir. 1986). “…in the statute; 25 U.S.C. § 466 directs the Secretary to make rules for the management of Indian forestry units; 25 U.S.C. § 318a covers roads on Indian reservations; § 323 empowers the Secretary to grant rights of way over Indian lands; § 324 covers consents for rights…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.