25 U.S.C. § 322
Applicability of certain provisions to Pueblo Indians
The provisions of the following statutes:
Sections 311, 319, and 357 of this title;
Sections 312 to 318 of this title;
Section 321 of this title; and
Sections 323 to 328 of this title,
are extended over and made applicable to the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico and their lands, whether owned by the Pueblo Indians or held in trust or set aside for their use and occupancy by Executive order or otherwise, under such rules, regulations, and conditions as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1976–1985 · leading case: Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana (1985)
“442 , as amended, 25 U. S. C. § 322 . Although the Department had consistently applied the general easement and right-of-way statutes to the Pueblos, a new Special Assistant to the Attorney General concluded in 1926 that, as a result of the peculiar wording of the Act of Mar.”
Plains Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc. v. Pueblo of Laguna and United States of America (1976)
“Legislative history and congressional intent are important factors in determining whether there has been a repeal by implication.”
Nebraska Public Power District v. 100.95 Acres of Land (1983)
“Subsequent congressional action affirms the continued vitality of section 357. In 1976, Congress indicated clearly that it believed section 357 and the 1948 Act were both still in effect by extending the reach of both statutes to the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico and their lands.”
Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1984)
“The answer is that Congress did not extend the application of these statutes to the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico until the Act of April 21, 1928, see 25 U.S.C. § 322 , which was after the Secretary had given his approval to the agreement with Mountain Bell.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.