25 U.S.C. § 335

Extension of provisions as to allotments

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless otherwise specifically provided, the provisions of the Act of February 8, 1887 (Twenty-fourth Statutes at Large, page 388), as amended, are extended to all lands heretofore purchased or which may be purchased by authority of Congress for the use or benefit of any individual Indian or band or tribe of Indians.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1928–1993 · leading case: St. Marie v. United States, 108 F.2d 876 (9th Cir. 1940).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

St. Marie v. United States, 108 F.2d 876 (9th Cir. 1940). · cites it 6× “The Act relied on is: "That unless otherwise specifically provided, the provisions of the [General Allotment Act], as amended, be and they are hereby, extended to all lands heretofore purchased or which may hereafter be purchased by authority of Congress for the use or benefit…”

Charles E. v. United States, 9 Cl. Ct. 537 (Ct. Cl. 1986). “1246 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 335 (1982)). . See Stevens v.”

Black Hills Inst. of Geological Rsch. v. South Dakota Sch. of Mines & Tech., 12 F.3d 737 (8th Cir. 1993). “Under 25 U.S.C. § 335 , however, provisions of the GAA continue to apply "to all lands heretofore purchased or which may be purchased by authority of Congress for' the use or benefit of any individual Indian or band or tribe of Indians,” "[u]nless otherwise specifically provided.”

Stevens v. Comm'r, 452 F.2d 741 (9th Cir. 1971). “11 It is the position of the taxpayer and the Interior Department that the Secretary acquired the lands pursuant to Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, that this acquisition was subject to the General Allotment Act of 1887 by reason of the 1923 Act, 25 U.S.C. §…”

Fredericks v. Mandel, 650 F.2d 144 (8th Cir. 1981). “, Tribal Condemnation of Purchased Trust Lands on the Fort Berthold Reservation (Oct.”

Work v. Mummert, 29 F.2d 393 (8th Cir. 1928). “1246 [25 USCA § 335]), wldch made applicable to lands purchased for Indian wards of the government the provisions of the law pertaining to restrictions upon allotments to Indians under restricted patents.”

United States v. Swain Cnty., 46 F.2d 99 (W.D.N.C. 1930). “The Act of February 14,1923 (25 USCA § 335), amending the Act of February 8, 1887, cannot apply to the lands in question, and was not intended by Congress' to apply to the lands in question, because the lands in question were never “purchased by Authority of Congress for the Use…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.