25 U.S.C. § 450d
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1978–2011 · leading case: United States v. Newell
United States v. Newell (2011)
“§§ 666 and 669 rather than 25 U.S.C. § 450d, despite the fact that he was charged with, and convicted of, violating only the former statutes.”
United States Ex Rel. Robert Burnette v. Ed Driving Hawk (1978)
“25 U.S.C. § 450d. On April 4,1978, the federal district court filed an order which stated: “It appearing that 25 U.”
United States v. Earl Largo (1985)
“First he argues that the indictment should have been dismissed because he was prosecuted under 18 U.”
United States v. James Harris and Richard Gray (1984)
“§§ 656 , 665; 25 U.S.C. § 450d; 42 U.S.C. § 3220 (b). In all of these and several other federal criminal statutes (see 12 U.”
United States v. Al Zephier (1990)
“See 25 U.S.C. § 450d (1988) (imposing criminal penalty for embezzlement of Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act monies).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.