25 U.S.C. § 450d
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1978–2011 · leading case: United States v. Newell, 658 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2011).
United States v. Newell, 658 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2011). “§§ 666 and 669 rather than 25 U.S.C. § 450d, despite the fact that he was charged with, and convicted of, violating only the former statutes.”
United States Ex Rel. Robert Burnette v. Ed Driving Hawk, 587 F.2d 23 (8th Cir. 1978). “25 U.S.C. § 450d. On April 4,1978, the federal district court filed an order which stated: “It appearing that 25 U.”
United States v. Earl Largo, 775 F.2d 1099 (10th Cir. 1985). “First he argues that the indictment should have been dismissed because he was prosecuted under 18 U.”
United States v. James Harris & Richard Gray, 729 F.2d 441 (7th Cir. 1984). “§§ 656 , 665; 25 U.S.C. § 450d; 42 U.S.C. § 3220 (b). In all of these and several other federal criminal statutes (see 12 U.”
United States v. Al Zephier, 916 F.2d 1368 (8th Cir. 1990). “See 25 U.S.C. § 450d (1988) (imposing criminal penalty for embezzlement of Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act monies).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.