25 U.S.C. § 450f

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 151 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015). · cites it 37× “Each provision of the ISDA and each provision of this Contract shall be liberally construed for the benefit of Sage to transfer the funding and certain programs, functions, services, and activities (hereinafter “PFSAs”), or portions thereof, and associated resources, that are…”

Loren Shirk v. United States, 773 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2014). · cites it 13× “25 U.S.C. § 450f (note). We begin our analysis of SHIRK V.”

Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). · cites it 19× “On the Eighth Claim, plaintiff is entitled to entry of a judgment in its favor declaring that defendants’ declination to award the Headquarters Office portion of the Tribal Shares Contract Proposal for FY 1996 violates 25 U.S.C. §§ 450f(a), 450j-l(a), (b) and (g), and is…”

Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 945 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.D.C. 2013). · cites it 11× “Consistent with 25 U.S.C. § 450f, 25 C.F.R. § 900.16 provides: How long does the Secretary have to review and approve the proposal and award the contract, or decline a proposal? The Secretary has 90 days after receipt of a proposal to review and approve the proposal and award…”

Ford v. Moore, 1996 SD 112 (S.D. 1996). · cites it 12× “acting within the scope of their employment in carrying out the contract or agreement: Provided, That after September 30, 1990, any civil action or proceeding involving such claims brought hereafter against any tribe, tribal organization, Indian contractor or tribal employee…”

Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla & Cupeño Indians v. Jewell, 729 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 7× “25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(2). The statutory basis for rejection relevant to this case is § 450f(a)(2)(D), which allows the Secretary to reject a contract application if “the amount of funds proposed under the contract is in excess of the applicable funding level for the contract.”

Samish Indian Nation v. United States, 419 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2005). · cites it 3× “The first count alleges violation of the ISDA on grounds that the government’s pre-1996 refusal to accord the Samish federal recognition wrongfully prevented the Samish from obtaining self-determination contracts, 25 U.S.C. § 450f, and funds (both program money and contract…”

Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (E.D. Okla. 2001). · cites it 7× “§ 450m-l(d) and ISDA Title III, § 303(d), reprinted at 25 U.S.C. § 450f (note). Thus, plaintiffs argue the Contract Disputes Act applies to their claims.”

Hinsley Ex Rel. K.M. v. Standing Rock Child Prot. Servs., 516 F.3d 668 (8th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4× “1915, 1959-60 (1990) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 450f notes); see also 25 U.S.”

Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 325 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2003). · cites it 5× “25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(A)-(E). A self-determination contract is defined as “a con *1136 tract .”

Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 285 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2002). · cites it 11× “§ 612 , the Tribe applied for a funded contract under a provision of the Indian Self Determination and Education Assistance Act (“IS-DEAA”), 25 U.S.C. § 450f. Under this provision, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, as well as the Secretary of the Interior, are…”

Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). · cites it 6× “" 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(1). The ISDA further states that "the provision of funds under this Act is subject to the availability of appropriations.”

Show all 151 citing cases →

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(1) — 1 case

Aleutian Pribilof Islands Ass'n v. Kempthorne, 537 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(2) — 1 case

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. Kempthorne, 496 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (D.S.D. 2007).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a) — 14 cases

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015). “Each provision of the ISDA and each provision of this Contract shall be liberally construed for the benefit of Sage to transfer the funding and certain programs, functions, services, and activities (hereinafter “PFSAs”), or portions thereof, and associated resources, that are…”

Ford v. Moore, 1996 SD 112 (S.D. 1996). “acting within the scope of their employment in carrying out the contract or agreement: Provided, That after September 30, 1990, any civil action or proceeding involving such claims brought hereafter against any tribe, tribal organization, Indian contractor or tribal employee…”

Arctic Slope Native Ass'n, Ltd. v. Sebelius, 583 F.3d 785 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Erikson v. United States, 12 Cl. Ct. 754 (Ct. Cl. 1987).

Eva Wilson, & Ass'n of Vill. Council Presidents v. James G. Watt, Sec'y of the Interior, 703 F.2d 395 (9th Cir. 1983).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(1) — 16 cases

Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). “" 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(1). The ISDA further states that "the provision of funds under this Act is subject to the availability of appropriations.”

Hinsley Ex Rel. K.M. v. Standing Rock Child Prot. Servs., 516 F.3d 668 (8th Cir. 2008). “1915, 1959-60 (1990) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 450f notes); see also 25 U.S.”

Tommy G. Thompson, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. v. Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, 334 F.3d 1075 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 263 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (D.N.M. 2016).

Bristol Bay Area Health Corp. v. United States, 110 Fed. Cl. 251 (Fed. Cl. 2013).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(1)(1995) — 1 case

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(1)(A) — 1 case

Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. Ryan, 415 F.3d 986 (9th Cir. 2005).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(1)(E) — 3 cases

Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 285 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2002). “§ 612 , the Tribe applied for a funded contract under a provision of the Indian Self Determination and Education Assistance Act (“IS-DEAA”), 25 U.S.C. § 450f. Under this provision, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, as well as the Secretary of the Interior, are…”

Stearney v. United States, 392 F. Supp. 3d 1037 (D. Ariz. 2019).

Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. Ryan, 415 F.3d 986 (9th Cir. 2005).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(2) — 25 cases

Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 945 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.D.C. 2013). “Consistent with 25 U.S.C. § 450f, 25 C.F.R. § 900.16 provides: How long does the Secretary have to review and approve the proposal and award the contract, or decline a proposal? The Secretary has 90 days after receipt of a proposal to review and approve the proposal and award…”

Loren Shirk v. United States, 773 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2014). “25 U.S.C. § 450f (note). We begin our analysis of SHIRK V.”

Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). “On the Eighth Claim, plaintiff is entitled to entry of a judgment in its favor declaring that defendants’ declination to award the Headquarters Office portion of the Tribal Shares Contract Proposal for FY 1996 violates 25 U.S.C. §§ 450f(a), 450j-l(a), (b) and (g), and is…”

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(2)(1995) — 1 case

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(2)(A) — 5 cases

S. Ute Indian Tribe v. Leavitt, 564 F.3d 1198 (10th Cir. 2009).

S. Ute Indian Tribe v. Leavitt, 497 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (D.N.M. 2007).

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1186 (D.N.M. 2015).

Tribe v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1057 (10th Cir. 2011).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(2)(A)(E) — 1 case

S. Ute Indian Tribe v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1071 (10th Cir. 2011).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(2)(C) — 2 cases

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1186 (D.N.M. 2015).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(2)(D) — 8 cases

Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla & Cupeño Indians v. Jewell, 729 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2013). “25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(2). The statutory basis for rejection relevant to this case is § 450f(a)(2)(D), which allows the Secretary to reject a contract application if “the amount of funds proposed under the contract is in excess of the applicable funding level for the contract.”

S. Ute Indian Tribe v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1071 (10th Cir. 2011).

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(2)(E) — 5 cases

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation v. United States, 637 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2009).

Val-U Const. Co. of South Dakota, Inc. v. United States, 905 F. Supp. 728 (D.S.D. 1995).

Hollywood Mobile Estates Ltd., a Florida Ltd. P'ship vs Mitchell Cypress, 415 F. App'x 207 (11th Cir. 2011).

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation v. United States of Am. (D.D.C. 2009).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(4) — 3 cases

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(Z) — 1 case

Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius, 72 F. Supp. 3d 227 (D.D.C. 2014).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l) — 19 cases

Council for Tribal Emp. Rights v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 231 (Fed. Cl. 2013).

Samish Indian Nation v. United States, 419 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “The first count alleges violation of the ISDA on grounds that the government’s pre-1996 refusal to accord the Samish federal recognition wrongfully prevented the Samish from obtaining self-determination contracts, 25 U.S.C. § 450f, and funds (both program money and contract…”

Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (E.D. Okla. 2001). “§ 450m-l(d) and ISDA Title III, § 303(d), reprinted at 25 U.S.C. § 450f (note). Thus, plaintiffs argue the Contract Disputes Act applies to their claims.”

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(1997) — 1 case

Wright v. Prairie Chicken, 1998 SD 46 (S.D. 1998).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(A) — 1 case

Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 325 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2003). “25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(A)-(E). A self-determination contract is defined as “a con *1136 tract .”

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(B) — 2 cases

Boney v. Valline, 597 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Nev. 2009).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(D) — 1 case

Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 325 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2003). “25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(A)-(E). A self-determination contract is defined as “a con *1136 tract .”

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(E) — 4 cases

Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 325 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2003). “25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(A)-(E). A self-determination contract is defined as “a con *1136 tract .”

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation v. United States, 637 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2009).

Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. Ryan, 415 F.3d 986 (9th Cir. 2005).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(a)(l)(b) — 1 case

Ronald Colbert v. United States, 785 F.3d 1384 (11th Cir. 2015).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(b) — 10 cases

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. Kempthorne, 496 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (D.S.D. 2007).

Pueblo of Zuni v. United States, 467 F. Supp. 2d 1099 (D.N.M. 2006).

S. Ute Indian Tribe v. Leavitt, 564 F.3d 1198 (10th Cir. 2009).

Busby Sch. of the N. Cheyenne Tribe v. United States, 8 Cl. Ct. 588 (Ct. Cl. 1985).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(b)(2) — 6 cases

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 86 F. Supp. 3d 1211 (D.N.M. 2015).

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 110 F. Supp. 3d 1140 (D.N.M. 2015).

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016).

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1186 (D.N.M. 2015).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(b)(3) — 10 cases

Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United States, 577 F. Supp. 2d 382 (D.D.C. 2008).

Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius, 72 F. Supp. 3d 227 (D.D.C. 2014).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(c) — 9 cases

Goss v. United States, 353 F. Supp. 3d 878 (D. Ariz. 2018).

Evans v. McKay, 869 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1989).

Demontiney v. United States ex rel. Dep't of Interior, 255 F.3d 801 (9th Cir. 2001).

United States v. CNA Fin. Corp., 381 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (D. Alaska 2005).

Blaze Constr., Inc. v. Crownpoint Inst. of Tech., 7 Navajo Rptr. 296 (1997).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(c)(3) — 7 cases

Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Mfg. Tech., Inc., 523 U.S. 751 (1998).

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Superior Court, 148 P.3d 1126 (Cal. 2006).

Walton v. Tesuque Pueblo, 443 F.3d 1274 (10th Cir. 2006).

Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Nash, 972 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (D.N.M. 2013).

Bassett v. Mashantucket Pequot Tribe, 204 F.3d 343 (2d Cir. 2000).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(c)(l) — 1 case

Coverage Issues Under the Indian Self-Determination Act (OLC 1998).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(d) — 11 cases

Hinsley Ex Rel. K.M. v. Standing Rock Child Prot. Servs., 516 F.3d 668 (8th Cir. 2008). “1915, 1959-60 (1990) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 450f notes); see also 25 U.S.”

Woodruff v. United States, 389 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir. 2004).

Trujillo v. United States, 313 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (D.N.M. 2003).

Wooten v. Hudson, 71 F. Supp. 2d 1149 (E.D. Okla. 1999).

Chickaway v. United States, 990 F. Supp. 2d 650 (S.D. Miss. 2013).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(e) — 2 cases

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. Kempthorne, 496 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (D.S.D. 2007).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(e)(1) — 2 cases

Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1186 (D.N.M. 2015).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(e)(2) — 2 cases

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(e)(3) — 1 case

Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Mfg. Tech., Inc., 523 U.S. 751 (1998).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(e)(l) — 8 cases

Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe v. Sebelius, 70 F. Supp. 3d 534 (D.D.C. 2014).

Ronald Colbert v. United States, 785 F.3d 1384 (11th Cir. 2015).

— 25 U.S.C. § 450f(l) — 1 case

Aleutian Pribilof Islands Ass'n v. Kempthorne, 537 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.