25 U.S.C. § 450l

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2002–2016 · leading case: Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2005).
Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2005). “” 25 U. S. C. § 450l(c) (Model Agreement §§ 1(a)(1), (b)(4)).”
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 1291 , we reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor the government and remand for further proceedings.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 263 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (D.N.M. 2016). “See 25 U.S.C. § 450l (c). The Court also concludes, however, that the second through .”
Prairie Cnty., Montana & Greenlee Cnty., Arizona v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 194 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “at 2187 (quoting 25 U.S.C. § 450l) (emphasis added). The model contract provided for by the ISDA specifies that “ ‘[sjubject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary shall make available to the Contractor the total amount specified in the annual funding agreement’…”
Cherokee Nation v. Thompson, 311 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2002). “” 25 U.S.C. § 450l(c) (describing § 1(b)(4) of model agreement).”
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius (D.D.C. 2014). “See 25 U.S.C. §§ 450l(a) and (c); id. at § 458aaa-3(a).”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450l(a) — 1 case
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius (D.D.C. 2014). “See 25 U.S.C. §§ 450l(a) and (c); id. at § 458aaa-3(a).”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450l(c) — 3 cases
Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2005). “” 25 U. S. C. § 450l(c) (Model Agreement §§ 1(a)(1), (b)(4)).”
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). “§ 1291 , we reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor the government and remand for further proceedings.”
Cherokee Nation v. Thompson, 311 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2002). “” 25 U.S.C. § 450l(c) (describing § 1(b)(4) of model agreement).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.