U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 44— NATIVE AMERICAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, TRADE PROMOTION, AND TOURISM

25 U.S.C. § 5

REPORT.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar
“Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 6, 2000], the Authority shall prepare and submit to the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Resources [now Committee on Natural Resources] of the House of Representatives, and to the governing body of each Indian tribe a report that includes—“(1) the findings of the Authority concerning the review conducted under section 4(d); and“(2) such recommendations concerning the proposed revisions to the laws that were subject to review as the Authority determines to be appropriate.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1990–2010 · leading case: Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. United States
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. United States (1990) cc · cites it 4× “273 , codified at 25 U.S.C. § 5 . Thus, by virtue of 25 U.S.”
In Re Emerald Outdoor Advertising, Llc, Debtor, Tiffany Harrison, Creditor Gold Eagle Gaming Llc, Creditor v. Emerald Ou (2006) ca9 · cites it 3× “Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 5 , 8 the BIA has promulgated regulations that establish a comprehensive scheme for recording title documents relating to Indian lands.”
Morton v. Kievit (In Re Vallecito Gas, LLC) (2010) txnb · cites it 2× “17 In making his argument, the Trustee appears to rely heavily on 25 U.S.C. § 5 and the federal regulations implementing that statute.”
In Re Emerald Outdoor Advertising, L.L.C. (2003) waeb “25 U.S.C. § 5 . Recording is the acceptance of a title document by the appropriate land title office of BIA which is charged with responsibility to maintain records of ownership.”
Emerald v. Harrison (2006) ca9 · cites it 3× “Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 5 ,8 the BIA has promulgated regu- lations that establish a comprehensive scheme for recording title documents relating to Indian lands.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.