25 U.S.C. § 509

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1987–1988 · leading case: Muscogee (Creek) Nation, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. Donald Hodel, Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Interior, 851 F.2d 1439 (D.C. Cir. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Muscogee (Creek) Nation, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. Donald Hodel, Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Interior, 851 F.2d 1439 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “The OIWA clearly does not expressly repeal the abolition of the Tribal Courts.”

Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Hodel, 670 F. Supp. 434 (D.D.C. 1987). “” 25 U.S. C. § 509. Plaintiff contends that, in light of the repealer clause of § 9, this Act should be construed to repeal the earlier legislation that outlawed the Muscogee courts.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.