25 U.S.C. § 565
Repealed. Pub. L. 117–261, § 2, Dec. 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 2393
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1977–2012 · leading case: Klamath Tribe Claims Comm. v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 203 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
Klamath Tribe Claims Comm. v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 203 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “897 (codified, as amended, at 25 U.S.C. §§ 565 -565g), addressed various claims that the Tribes had pursued against the United States.”
Delaware Tribal Bus. Comm. v. Weeks, 430 U.S. 73 (1977). “[22] The congressional decision to distribute funds only to individuals who were members of, or clearly identified with, specific tribes has precedent in other similar statutes.”
Klamath Tribe Claims Comm. v. United States, 106 Fed. Cl. 87 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “897 (codified, as amended, at 25 U.S.C. §§ 565 -565g), addressed various claims that the Tribes had pursued against the United States.”
George Kicking Woman v. Donald P. Hodel, Sec'y of the Interior, & Leo Lee Old Person, 878 F.2d 1203 (9th Cir. 1989). “1985) (interpreting 25 U.S.C. § 565 ) (citing Arenas v. U.S., 197 F.”
Ruff v. Hodel, 770 F.2d 839 (9th Cir. 1985). “897 , 25 U.S.C. §§ 565 -565g. Warren Ruffs known heirs received partial distribution in 1975 following a determination of heirship by the area director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.