25 U.S.C. § 612
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2004–2010 · leading case: Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United States, 364 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United States, 364 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “The Tribes argued before the Court of Federal Claims that 25 U.S.C. § 612 , which establishes a trust for the Shoshone and Arapaho Tribes, requires the Government to pay interest on funds that the Government should have, but did not, collect and deposit in the tribal trust.”
Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed. Cl. 629 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “However, the Shoshone court also found this duty to pay interest emanating from 25 U.S.C. § 612 , which governed the specific reservation at issue.”
Wolfchild v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 302 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “3d at 1352 (noting that the principle articulated in Blackfeet supported the court's interpretation that the government was obligated under 25 U.S.C. § 612 to credit prejudgment interest to plaintiffs); Doyon, Ltd.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.