25 U.S.C. § 631
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1950–2023 · leading case: Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM, 458 U.S. 832 (1982).
Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM, 458 U.S. 832 (1982). “44 (1950), 25 U. S. C. § 631 et seq.; Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 88 Stat.”
Navajo Nation v. United States, 501 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “” 25 U.S.C. § 631 . The Act thus appropriated $500,000 and “funds from time to time appropriated pursuant to this subchapter” for “[sjurveys and studies of timber, coal, mineral, and other physical and human resources” and mandated that the Nation “be kept informed and afforded…”
Meyers Ex Rel. Meyers v. Bd. of Educ., 905 F. Supp. 1544 (D. Utah 1995). “44 , 45, 44 (1950) (codified at 25 U.S.C.A § 631). For all of these reasons, the court concludes that the dicta in Navajo Nation to the effect that the United States’ obligation under the 1868 treaty to provide education for the Navajos lasted no more than ten years does not…”
Jamien Jensen v. Exc Inc., 82 F.4th 835 (9th Cir. 2023). “Congress’s declaration of purpose in authorizing funds to construct roads within the Navajo reservation, see 25 U.S.C. § 631 (2012 ed.), does not provide any basis for displacing state law that would otherwise be applicable under Strate.”
Begay v. Miller, 222 P.2d 624 (Ariz. 1950). “3, page 414, 25 U.S.C.A. § 631 et seq., shows that the bill eliminates all of the provisions of section 9, which refer to the applicability of state civil and criminal laws and court jurisdiction on the Navajo-Hopi Reservations.”
The Hopi Tribe, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 43 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “Hopi Indians,” 25 U.S.C. § 631 , and Congress has appropriated $2.”
Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 619 F.2d 801 (9th Cir. 1980). “, 25 U.S.C. § 631 et seq. Far from terminating prior executive order reservations, the 1934 Act reinforces them by recognizing and confirming Indian title.”
Buck Austin v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, 638 F.2d 113 (9th Cir. 1981). “FACTS In 1950 Congress enacted the Navajo Hopi Rehabilitation Act, 25 U.S.C. § 631 et seq. which provided funds for surveys and studies of coal and other resources on the Navajo and Hopi reservations.”
Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Navajo Tribe of Indians, 731 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1984). “, or the Navajo-Hopi Rehabilitation Act, 25 U.S.C. § 631 et seq., would have to secure the Secretary’s approval of its taxes.”
Eeoc v. Peabody W. Coal Co. (9th Cir. 2014). “It held that the EEOC sought affirmative relief against the Nation, defeating Rule 19 joinder; that the Secretary was a necessary party for whom joinder was not feasible; and that the tribal hiring preference did not violate Title VII because it was authorized by the Navajo-Hopi…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.