25 U.S.C. § 672

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1972–2007 · leading case: Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972). · cites it 2× “194 , 25 U. S. C. § 672 . The remaining 40% was awarded to the Southern Ute Tribe.”

Felter, Oranna v. Kempthorne, Dirk, 473 F.3d 1255 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “” 25 U.S.C. § 672 . According to the complaint, however, the Bureau of Indian Affairs knew that the Share and Share Alike agreement was invalid because the members of the Uinta Band had never approved it.”

Hackford v. Babbitt, 14 F.3d 1457 (10th Cir. 1994). “) See 25 U.S.C. § 672 (authorizing Secretary to divide trust fund belonging to Confederated .”

Whiskers v. United States, 600 F.2d 1332 (10th Cir. 1979). “25 U.S.C. § 672 , enacted in 1951, divided certain trust funds, giving a portion to the Southern Utes.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.