U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XXVIII— UTE INDIANS OF UTAH: DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS BETWEEN MIXED-BLOOD AND FULL-BLOOD MEMBERS; TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION OVER PROPERTY OF MIXED-BLOOD MEMBERS

25 U.S.C. § 677a

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases, 1972–2020 · leading case: Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States (1972) scotus · cites it 2× “25 U. S. C. §§ 677a (b) and (c). The provision as to choice is § 4 of the Act, 25 U.”
Felter v. Salazar (2010) dcd · cites it 2× “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). Mixed-bloods were defined as Ute members who did not have sufficient Ute or Indian ancestry to qualify as full-bloods.”
Hackford v. Babbitt (1994) ca10 · cites it 4× “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). The “mixed-blood” group was comprised of those individuals who either did not possess sufficient Indian or Ute Indian blood to qualify as “full-bloods” or who became a mixed-blood member by choice under section 677e after having been initially classified…”
Felter, Oranna v. Kempthorne, Dirk (2007) cadc “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). “Mixed-blood” Utes — members of the tribe who do not meet these criteria, id.”
Chapoose v. Clark (1985) utd · cites it 3× “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). None of the plaintiffs meet this blood-quantum requirement.”
Felter v. Norton (2006) dcd “25 U.S.C. § 677a. The UPA’s definitions of mixed-bloods and full-bloods were based on the Ute General Council’s definitions.”
United States v. Oranna Bumgarner Felter (1985) ca10 “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b), (c). The Act required the preparation and publication of rolls listing the full-blood and mixed-blood members of the Tribe.”
Ute Distribution Corporation, a Utah Corporation v. Ute Indian Tribe (1998) ca10 “The "mixed-blood" group was comprised of those individuals who either did not possess sufficient Indian or Ute Indian blood to qualify as a full-blood tribal member or became a mixed-blood member by choice under provisions of the UPA. See id.”
Allred v. United States (1995) uscfc “Plaintiffs’ request for class action certification is dismissed as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment dismissing the complaint.”
Tabbee v. United States (1993) uscfc “” It defines a “mixed-blood” member as one who either does not possess sufficient Indian or Ute Indian blood to fall within the full-blood class or one who becomes a "mixed-blood” by choice---25 U.S.C. §§ 677a(b) and (c). . These provisions were patterned after a Resolution…”
Murdock v. Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah & Ouray Reservation (1992) ca10 “His son, Mac Eugene Murdock, is the second appellant.”
Ute Distribution Corp. v. United States (1989) utd “The Act defines “asset" to mean "all property of the Tribe, real, personal or mixed, whether held by the tribe or by the United States in trust for the tribe_" 25 U.S.C. § 677a. 15 . It is urged by plaintiffs that since neither mixed-bloods nor corporations organized for their…”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b) — 12 cases
Felter, Oranna v. Kempthorne, Dirk (2007) cadc “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). “Mixed-blood” Utes — members of the tribe who do not meet these criteria, id.”
Chapoose v. Clark (1985) utd “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). None of the plaintiffs meet this blood-quantum requirement.”
Felter v. Salazar (2010) dcd “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). Mixed-bloods were defined as Ute members who did not have sufficient Ute or Indian ancestry to qualify as full-bloods.”
United States v. Oranna Bumgarner Felter (1985) ca10 “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b), (c). The Act required the preparation and publication of rolls listing the full-blood and mixed-blood members of the Tribe.”
Ute Distribution Corporation, a Utah Corporation v. Ute Indian Tribe (1998) ca10 “The "mixed-blood" group was comprised of those individuals who either did not possess sufficient Indian or Ute Indian blood to qualify as a full-blood tribal member or became a mixed-blood member by choice under provisions of the UPA. See id.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 677a(c) — 6 cases
Felter v. Salazar (2010) dcd “25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). Mixed-bloods were defined as Ute members who did not have sufficient Ute or Indian ancestry to qualify as full-bloods.”
Allred v. United States (1995) uscfc “Plaintiffs’ request for class action certification is dismissed as moot. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment dismissing the complaint.”
Hackford v. Babbitt (1994) ca10 “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). The “mixed-blood” group was comprised of those individuals who either did not possess sufficient Indian or Ute Indian blood to qualify as “full-bloods” or who became a mixed-blood member by choice under section 677e after having been initially classified…”
Ute Distribution Corp. v. United States (1991) ca10
UTE Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior (2008) utd
— 25 U.S.C. § 677a(f) — 1 case
Hackford v. Babbitt (1994) ca10 “” 25 U.S.C. § 677a(b). The “mixed-blood” group was comprised of those individuals who either did not possess sufficient Indian or Ute Indian blood to qualify as “full-bloods” or who became a mixed-blood member by choice under section 677e after having been initially classified…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.