25 U.S.C. § 677e
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1972–2012 · leading case: Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States (1972)
“Section 6 of the Act, 25 U. S. C. § 677e, authorized the mixed-bloods to organize, to adopt a constitution and bylaws, and to provide, by that constitution, for the selection of authorized representatives with power "to take any action that is required by [the Act] to be taken…”
Felter v. Salazar (2010)
“8042 -03, the plaintiffs assert that the termination was ineffective because the UPA was never implemented as intended by Congress. (Id.) However, in Affiliated Ute Citizens, the Supreme Court recognized that the UPA had been implemented as intended by Congress.”
Ute Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior of the United States (2009)
“25 U.S.C. § 677e; App. at 130. In October 1956, the AUC and the Tribal Business Committee agreed upon a “Plan for Division of Assets” (Plan for Division).”
Hackford v. Babbitt (1994)
“25 U.S.C. § 677e. The AUC and the Tribal Business Committee thereafter adopted a plan to divide the tribal assets, under which the divisible assets would be transferred directly to each individual mixed-blood.”
Maldonado v. Hodel (1988)
“shall have the right to organize for their common welfare, and may adopt an appropriate constitution and bylaws which shall become effective when ratified by a majority vote of the adult mixed-blood members of the tribe at a special election .”
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. Ute Distribution Corp. (2012)
“” 25 U.S.C. § 677e. It continues: “Such constitution may provide for the selection of authorized representatives who shall have power to take any action that is required by this subchapter to be taken by the mixed-blood members as a group.”
Ute Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior of the United States (1996)
“§ 677L The Secretary of the Interior continues to maintain a supervisory role over the joint management of indivisible tribal assets, even *1306 though the individual mixed-bloods’ tribal and federal Indian status has been terminated with respect to all other assets and rights.”
UTE Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior (2008)
“25 U.S.C. § 677e. In October 1956, the AUC and the Tribal Business Committee agreed to and adopted criteria governing how the tribal assets were to be divided in the “Plan for Division of Assets” (the “Plan”).”
Felter v. Norton (2010)
“) However, in Affiliated Ute Citizens, the Supreme Court recognized that the UPA had been implemented as intended by Congress.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.