25 U.S.C. § 677v
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972).
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972). “" § 23, 25 U. S. C. § 677v. Those assets, such as the mineral estate, excepted from the division plans, were to be "managed jointly by the Tribal Business Committee and the authorized representatives of the mixed-blood group.”
United States v. Felter, 546 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Utah 1982). “Section 23 of the Act, 25 U.S.C. § 677v, provides as follows: Upon removal of Federal restrictions on the property of each individual mixed-blood member of the tribe, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a proclamation declaring that the Federal trust relationship…”
Ute Distrib. Corp., a Utah Corp. v. Ute Indian Tribe, 149 F.3d 1260 (10th Cir. 1998). “8042 (1961); see also 25 U.S.C. § 677v (requiring publication of proclamation declaring termination).”
United States v. Oranna Bumgarner Felter, 752 F.2d 1505 (10th Cir. 1985). “25 U.S.C. § 677v. 5 . Section 1165 provides that: Whoever, without lawful authority or permission, willfully and knowingly goes upon any land that belongs to any Indian or Indian tribe, band, or group and either are held by the United States in trust or are subject to a…”
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 935 F. Supp. 1473 (D. Utah 1996). “” Section 23 of the Act, 25 U.S.C. § 677v, provides that following removal of trust restrictions on the property of Mixed-Blood Ute members, “All statutes of the United States which affect Indians because of their status as Indians shall no longer be applicable to such member…”
Maldonado v. Hodel, 683 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Utah 1988). “25 U.S.C. § 677v (emphasis added). Plaintiffs are members of the mixed-blood group *1330 who were terminated under the Act.”
United States v. Murdock, 919 F. Supp. 1534 (D. Utah 1996). “25 U.S.C. § 677v (emphasis added). Because of the Ute Termination Act, the 490 mixed-bloods whose names were on the final roll of mixed-blood members of the Ute Indian Tribe are sometimes referred to as “Terminated Utes.”
State v. Gardner, 827 P.2d 980 (Utah Ct. App. 1992). “§ 677v, which states, in relevant portion, as follows: All statutes of the United States which affect Indians because of their status as Indians shall no longer be applicable to such member over which supervision has been terminated, and the laws of the several States shall…”
LaBaron v. United States, 989 F.2d 425 (10th Cir. 1993). “” 25 U.S.C. § 677v. Section 667g made clear that "such rolls shall be final for the purposes of this subchapter, but said section shall not be construed .”
Hackford v. United States Dep't of the Interior (D. Utah 2024). “26, 1961); 25 U.S.C. § 677v. 36 25 U.S.C. § 677v. 37 (See Comp.”
Hackford v. United States Dep't of the Interior (D. Utah 2025). “26, 1961); 25 U.S.C. § 677v. 30 25 U.S.C. § 677v. 31 (See Am.”
Hackford v. State (10th Cir. 2020). “” UPA § 23 (25 U.S.C. § 677v). Finally, and most relevant here, the UPA made “the laws of the several States [applicable] to such [a person identified in the Federal Register as ‘mixed-blood’] in the same manner as they apply to other citizens within their jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.