U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XXVIII— UTE INDIANS OF UTAH: DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS BETWEEN MIXED-BLOOD AND FULL-BLOOD MEMBERS; TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION OVER PROPERTY OF MIXED-BLOOD MEMBERS

25 U.S.C. § 677v

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States (1972) scotus · cites it 8× “" § 23, 25 U. S. C. § 677v. Those assets, such as the mineral estate, excepted from the division plans, were to be "managed jointly by the Tribal Business Committee and the authorized representatives of the mixed-blood group.”
United States v. Felter (1982) utd · cites it 8× “Section 23 of the Act, 25 U.S.C. § 677v, provides as follows: Upon removal of Federal restrictions on the property of each individual mixed-blood member of the tribe, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a proclamation declaring that the Federal trust relationship…”
Ute Distribution Corporation, a Utah Corporation v. Ute Indian Tribe (1998) ca10 · cites it 2× “8042 (1961); see also 25 U.S.C. § 677v (requiring publication of proclamation declaring termination).”
United States v. Oranna Bumgarner Felter (1985) ca10 “25 U.S.C. § 677v. 5 . Section 1165 provides that: Whoever, without lawful authority or permission, willfully and knowingly goes upon any land that belongs to any Indian or Indian tribe, band, or group and either are held by the United States in trust or are subject to a…”
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah (1996) utd · cites it 2× “” Section 23 of the Act, 25 U.S.C. § 677v, provides that following removal of trust restrictions on the property of Mixed-Blood Ute members, “All statutes of the United States which affect Indians because of their status as Indians shall no longer be applicable to such member…”
Maldonado v. Hodel (1988) utd · cites it 2× “25 U.S.C. § 677v (emphasis added). Plaintiffs are members of the mixed-blood group *1330 who were terminated under the Act.”
United States v. Murdock (1996) utd “25 U.S.C. § 677v (emphasis added). Because of the Ute Termination Act, the 490 mixed-bloods whose names were on the final roll of mixed-blood members of the Ute Indian Tribe are sometimes referred to as “Terminated Utes.”
State v. Gardner (1992) utahctapp “§ 677v, which states, in relevant portion, as follows: All statutes of the United States which affect Indians because of their status as Indians shall no longer be applicable to such member over which supervision has been terminated, and the laws of the several States shall…”
LaBaron v. United States (1993) ca10 “” 25 U.S.C. § 677v. Section 667g made clear that "such rolls shall be final for the purposes of this subchapter, but said section shall not be construed .”
Hackford v. United States Department of the Interior (2024) utd · cites it 3× “26, 1961); 25 U.S.C. § 677v. 36 25 U.S.C. § 677v. 37 (See Comp.”
Hackford v. United States Department of the Interior (2025) utd · cites it 3× “26, 1961); 25 U.S.C. § 677v. 30 25 U.S.C. § 677v. 31 (See Am.”
Hackford v. State (2020) ca10 · cites it 2× “” UPA § 23 (25 U.S.C. § 677v). Finally, and most relevant here, the UPA made “the laws of the several States [applicable] to such [a person identified in the Federal Register as ‘mixed-blood’] in the same manner as they apply to other citizens within their jurisdiction.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.