25 U.S.C. § 903b
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1976–2000 · leading case: Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (2000).
Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (2000). “, the Menominee Restoration Act, 25 U. S. C. § 903b, and the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.”
Sturdevant v. Wilber, 464 F. Supp. 327 (E.D. Wis. 1979). “25 U.S.C. § 903b. The purpose of the MRC was to “represent the Menominee people in the implementation of the Act.”
Sturdevant v. Deer, 70 F.R.D. 539 (E.D. Wis. 1976). “The plaintiffs have offered no cases or substantial arguments to show that the decisionmaking committees in question are other than “tribal” committees, within the broad scope of Talton v. Mayes. Counts 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9, which are “founded directly” on the fifth amendment of…”
Sturdevant v. Wilber, 456 F. Supp. 428 (E.D. Wis. 1978). “Under 25 U.S.C. § 903b, the Menominee Restoration Committee (MRC) was *430 created.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 903b(a) — 3 cases
Sturdevant v. Wilber, 464 F. Supp. 327 (E.D. Wis. 1979). “25 U.S.C. § 903b. The purpose of the MRC was to “represent the Menominee people in the implementation of the Act.”
Sturdevant v. Deer, 70 F.R.D. 539 (E.D. Wis. 1976). “The plaintiffs have offered no cases or substantial arguments to show that the decisionmaking committees in question are other than “tribal” committees, within the broad scope of Talton v. Mayes. Counts 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9, which are “founded directly” on the fifth amendment of…”
Sturdevant v. Wilber, 456 F. Supp. 428 (E.D. Wis. 1978). “Under 25 U.S.C. § 903b, the Menominee Restoration Committee (MRC) was *430 created.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.