U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— MISCELLANEOUS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XLIII— CATAWBA TRIBE OF SOUTH CAROLINA: DIVISION OF ASSETS

25 U.S.C. § 935

Repealed. Pub. L. 103–116, § 4(c), Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1121

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–2007 · leading case: South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc., 476 U.S. 498 (1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc., 476 U.S. 498 (1986). · cites it 4× “" 25 U. S. C. § 935 . This provision establishes two principles in unmistakably clear language.”
The Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. The United States, 982 F.2d 1564 (Fed. Cir. 1993). · cites it 2× “Section 5 of the Act, now codified at 25 U.S.C. § 935 , contains the following provision: The constitution of the tribe .”
Bldg. Inspector & Zoning Officer v. Wampanoag Aquinnah Shellfish Hatchery Corp., 443 Mass. 1 (Mass. 2004). “498, 504-506, 510 (1986) (concluding that language in 25 U.S.C. § 935 , providing that “the laws of the several States *14 shall apply to [the Catawba Tribe and its members] in the same manner they apply to other persons or citizens within their jurisdiction,” obligated the…”
Catawba Indian Tribe v. United States, 24 Cl. Ct. 24 (Ct. Cl. 1991). · cites it 2× “Not only was plaintiff’s basic land claim not inherently unknowable, but plaintiff was well aware that it was ripe nearly 100 years ago, when it asked for the Department of Interior’s assistance in obtaining either compensation or a return of the land in the early 1900’s.”
Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. Ryan, 484 F.3d 41 (1st Cir. 2007). “That Catawba statute declared: “[T]he [Catawba] tribe and its members shall not be entitled to [certain federal services] ..., and the laws of the several States shall apply to them in the same manner they apply to other persons or citizens within their jurisdiction.”
Catawba Indian Tribe v. South Carolina, 718 F.2d 1291 (4th Cir. 1983). · cites it 3× “§ 935 which provides: [T]he Tribe and its members shall not be entitled to any of the special services performed by the United States for Indians because of their status as Indians, all statutes of the United States that affect Indians because of their status as Indians shall be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.