26 U.S.C. § 4191
Repealed. Pub. L. 116–94, div. N, title I, § 501(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3118]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 2011–2020 · leading case: Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012).
Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012). “…includ- ing exactions imposed on high-income taxpayers, see ACA §§9015, 10906; HCERA §1402, medical devices, see 26 U. S. C. §4191 (2006 ed., Supp. IV), and tanning booths, see §5000B. It spends government money on, among other things, the study of how to spend less…”
Florida Ex Rel. Attorney Gen. v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 648 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2011). “The point is amply made by simply looking at four different provisions: (1) an Excise Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers, 26 U.S.C. § 4191 (a) ("There is hereby imposed on the sale of any taxable medical device by the manufacturer, producer, or importer a tax equal to 2.”
State of Texas v. USA, 945 F.3d 355 (5th Cir. 2019). “§ 343 (q)(5)(H); 26 U.S.C. § 4191 (a). Moreover, Congress has made a number of substantive amendments to the ACA, revising the statute in 2010, 2011, 2014, 2017, and 2018.”
Chemence Med. Prods., Inc. v. Medline Indus., Inc., 989 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (N.D. Ga. 2013). “” 26 U.S.C. § 4191 (a). “Under section 4191(a), tax is imposed on the sale of any taxable medical device by the manufacturer, pro *1351 ducer, or importer of the device.”
State of Texas v. USA (5th Cir. 2019). “§ 343 (q)(5)(H); 26 U.S.C. § 4191 (a). Moreover, Congress has made a number of substantive amendments to the ACA, revising the statute in 2010, 2011, 2014, 2017, and 2018.”
State of Texas v. USA (5th Cir. 2020). “§ 343 (q)(5)(H); 26 U.S.C. § 4191 (a). Moreover, Congress has made a number of substantive amendments to the ACA, revising the statute in 2010, 2011, 2014, 2017, and 2018.”
Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius (2012). “…includ- ing exactions imposed on high-income taxpayers, see ACA §§9015, 10906; HCERA §1402, medical devices, see 26 U. S. C. §4191 (2006 ed., Supp. IV), and tanning booths, see §5000B. It spends government money on, among other things, the study of how to spend less…”
State of Florida v. U.S. Dep't of HHS (11th Cir. 2011). “” (emphasis added)); (2) an Excise Tax on High Cost Employer-Sponsored Health Coverage, id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.