26 U.S.C. § 4980I

Repealed. Pub. L. 116–94, div. N, title I, § 503(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3119]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2012–2018 · leading case: Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012).
Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012). · cites it 2× “” See 26 U. S. C. §4980I (2006 ed., Supp. IV) (high-cost insurance plans); 42 U.”
John Gallo v. Moen Inc., 813 F.3d 265 (6th Cir. 2016). “In March 2013, the company decreased the benefits available for retirees in response to “recent Medicare improvements” and “more effective supplemental benefit plans,” as well as the federal government’s imposition of an excise tax on high-cost “Cadillac plans” through the…”
Tex. v. United States, 340 F. Supp. 3d 579 (N.D. Tex. 2018). “These include, among other things, an excise tax on high-cost insurance plans, 26 U.S.C. § 4980I ; the elimination of coverage limits, 42 U.”
Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius (2012). “” See 26 U. S. C. §4980I (2006 ed., Supp. IV) (high-cost insurance plans); 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.