26 U.S.C. § 5205
Repealed. Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, § 454(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 820]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 149
cases, 1960–1983 · leading case: United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573 (1971).
United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573 (1971). “" Respondent was subsequently charged with possession of nontaxpaid liquor, in violation of 26 U. S. C. § 5205 (a) (2). His pretrial motion to suppress the seized evidence on the ground that the affidavit was insufficient to establish probable cause was overruled, and he was…”
United States v. Lee Vainderbilt Pruitt, 341 F.2d 700 (4th Cir. 1965). “§ 5601 [a] [12] and counts two and four under 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205 [a] [2], 5604 [a] [1]. 2 .”
United States v. Buel Lee Shepherd, 714 F.2d 316 (4th Cir. 1983). “*316 Buel Lee Shepherd was convicted of possessing thirty-eight gallons of moonshine whiskey on which the tax had not been paid, and of removing it from its place of manufacture and concealing it, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205 (a)(1), 5604(a)(1) and 5601(a)(12).”
United States v. Roy Whitehead, 424 F.2d 446 (6th Cir. 1970). “§§ 5173 (a) and 5601(a) (4); on counts 3 and 4 for possessing and transporting distilled spirits in containers not having affixed thereto the required revenue stamps in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205 (a) (2) and 5604(a) (1); on count 5 for possessing an unregistered still in…”
United States v. William Garland Bradshaw, 490 F.2d 1097 (4th Cir. 1974). “WINTER, Circuit Judge: Defendant appeals from his conviction upon a jury verdict that he possessed non-tax-paid whiskey in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205 (a), 5604(a). The only question raised by this appeal is the admissibility, at defendant’s trial, of certain jugs of…”
Odell Clark v. United States, 293 F.2d 445 (5th Cir. 1961). “§ 5632 , and for the transportation of the same commodity contrary to 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5205 (a) (2) and 5604(a). He was jointly indicted with Kyle Bennett Crowley who entered a plea of guilty.”
United States v. Burnis Bryant, United States of Am. v. Henry Church Bryant, 461 F.2d 912 (6th Cir. 1972). “§ 5691 (a), and of three counts of possessing, transferring, and selling distilled spirits the containers of which were not affixed with the tax stamps required by 26 U.S.C. § 5205 (a)(2), in violation of 26 U.”
Norton Edward Richardson v. United States, 360 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1966). “LYNNE, District Judge: Convicted under a two-count indictment charging him with unlawful possession of fifty gallons of nontaxpaid whiskey ( 26 U.S.C. § 5205 (a) (2)) and the unlawful removal or concealment thereof ( 26 U.”
Carvell McMillian Mary Lynn McMillian Bobby McMillian & John William McMillian v. United States, 363 F.2d 165 (5th Cir. 1966). “§§ 5601 (a) (7), 5222 (making and fermenting mash); 26 U.S.C. § 5205 (a) (2) (possession of non-taxpaid spirits) ; and 26 U.”
United States v. Harold Dean McKenzie, 446 F.2d 949 (6th Cir. 1971). “This is an appeal from convictions under two counts of possession of unstamped distilled spirits and one count of transporting unstamped distilled spirits, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205 (a) (2) and 5604(a) (1).”
Carl Turner Weaver v. United States, 298 F.2d 496 (5th Cir. 1962). “This appeal was taken after appellant’s conviction under a two count indictment charging him with violation of the Internal Revenue law relating to non-tax paid liquor, 26 U.S.C. § 5205 (a) (2) and 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (4).”
W. A. Compton v. United States, 377 F.2d 408 (8th Cir. 1967). “This is an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas, wherein the United States filed its libel of information against one 1964 GMC pickup truck, its tools and appurtenances, for forfeiture alleging violations of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205…”
— 26 U.S.C. § 5205(a) — 3 cases
Verner Caulk Harris & Verner Earl Harris v. United States, 384 F.2d 363 (5th Cir. 1967).
United States v. Cleveland Johns, 438 F.2d 639 (5th Cir. 1971).
United States v. Lee Roy Thurman, 440 F.2d 1323 (6th Cir. 1971).
— 26 U.S.C. § 5205(a)(2) — 2 cases
United States v. Charles W. Sexton, 473 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1973).
United States v. Frank Paul Castro & Nena Castro, 476 F.2d 750 (9th Cir. 1973).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.