26 U.S.C. § 66

Treatment of community income

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Treatment of community income where spouses live apartIf—(1) 2 individuals are married to each other at any time during a calendar year;(2) such individuals—(A) live apart at all times during the calendar year, and(B) do not file a joint return under section 6013 with each other for a taxable year beginning or ending in the calendar year;(3) one or both of such individuals have earned income for the calendar year which is community income; and(4) no portion of such earned income is transferred (directly or indirectly) between such individuals before the close of the calendar year,then, for purposes of this title, any community income of such individuals for the calendar year shall be treated in accordance with the rules provided by section 879(a).(b) Secretary may disregard community property laws where spouse not notified of community income

The Secretary may disallow the benefits of any community property law to any taxpayer with respect to any income if such taxpayer acted as if solely entitled to such income and failed to notify the taxpayer’s spouse before the due date (including extensions) for filing the return for the taxable year in which the income was derived of the nature and amount of such income.

(c) Spouse relieved of liability in certain other casesUnder regulations prescribed by the Secretary, if—(1) an individual does not file a joint return for any taxable year,(2) such individual does not include in gross income for such taxable year an item of community income properly includible therein which, in accordance with the rules contained in section 879(a), would be treated as the income of the other spouse,(3) the individual establishes that he or she did not know of, and had no reason to know of, such item of community income, and(4) taking into account all facts and circumstances, it is inequitable to include such item of community income in such individual’s gross income,then, for purposes of this title, such item of community income shall be included in the gross income of the other spouse (and not in the gross income of the individual). Under procedures prescribed by the Secretary, if, taking into account all the facts and circumstances, it is inequitable to hold the individual liable for any unpaid tax or any deficiency (or any portion of either) attributable to any item for which relief is not available under the preceding sentence, the Secretary may relieve such individual of such liability.(d) DefinitionsFor purposes of this section—(1) Earned income

The term “earned income” has the meaning given to such term by section 911(d)(2).

(2) Community income

The term “community income” means income which, under applicable community property laws, is treated as community income.

(3) Community property laws

The term “community property laws” means the community property laws of a State, a foreign country, or a possession of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 96–605, title I, § 101(a), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3521; amended Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, § 424(b)(1)–(2)(B), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 802, 803; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, § 7841(d)(8), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2428; Pub. L. 105–206, title III, § 3201(b), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 739.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1998—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–206 inserted at end “Under procedures prescribed by the Secretary, if, taking into account all the facts and circumstances, it is inequitable to hold the individual liable for any unpaid tax or any deficiency (or any portion of either) attributable to any item for which relief is not available under the preceding sentence, the Secretary may relieve such individual of such liability.”

1989—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 101–239 substituted “section 911(d)(2)” for “section 911(b)”.

1984—Pub. L. 98–369, § 424(b)(2)(A), struck out “where spouses live apart” in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–369, § 424(b)(2)(B), substituted “Treatment of community income where spouses live apart” for “General rule” in heading.

Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 98–369, § 424(b)(1), added subsecs. (b) and (c) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (d).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–206 applicable to any liability for tax arising after July 22, 1998, and any liability for tax arising on or before such date but remaining unpaid as of such date, see section 3201(g)(1) of Pub. L. 105–206, set out as a note under section 6015 of this title.

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–369 applicable to all taxable years to which the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [formerly I.R.C. 1954] applies with corresponding provisions deemed to be included in the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 and applicable to all taxable years to which such Code applies, except subsection (b) of this section is applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1984, see section 424(c) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 6013 of this title.

Effective Date

Pub. L. 96–605, title I, § 101(c), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3522, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply to calendar years beginning after December 31, 1980.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Cathy Miller Hardy v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 181 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 1999).
Cathy Miller Hardy v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 181 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 1999). · cites it 4× “See 26 U.S.C. § 66 . Section 66 of the Internal Revenue Code contains three provisions by which a spouse living in a community property state may be able to avoid paying income tax on the other spouse’s income or earnings if that spouse did not receive the benefit of the…”
Bobbie J. Roberts v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 860 F.2d 1235 (5th Cir. 1988). · cites it 4× “Taxpayer sought relief under 26 U.S.C. § 66 (c) from liability for the community income and argued that she was not liable for the addition to tax penalty under the reasonable cause exception of section 6651(a).”
Denise Mannella v. Comm'r IRS, 631 F.3d 115 (3rd Cir. 2011). · cites it 5× “at 21-22, Congress amended 26 U.S.C. § 66 (addressing the treatment of community property when spouses do not file joint returns in community-property states) by adding a subsection (c) at the same time it added subsection (f) to § 6015, and the language of each subsection…”
Christensen v. Comm'r, 523 F.3d 957 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “, 26 U.S.C. § 66 (a) (addressing treatment of community property income for separated spouses); see also id.”
United States v. Melot (Billy), 562 F. App'x 646 (10th Cir. 2014). · cites it 3× “The district court rejected her request under 26 U.S.C. § 66 (c) because she knew or had reason to know of the community income.”
United States v. Lebeau, 335 F. Supp. 3d 1206 (S.D. Cal. 2018). · cites it 4× “However, in another case where the district court granted the government's motion for summary judgment granting a foreclosure order on the subject property, the court rejected the non-delinquent spouse's defense that she would qualify as an "innocent spouse" under *1215 26…”
Est. of Abraham v. Comm'r, 408 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 2005). “Here, the Notice specifically named § 2036 as the legal basis for the deficiency and explained the factual basis for the determination as being Mrs.”
United States v. Richard Tilford, 810 F.3d 370 (5th Cir. 2016). “Under procedures prescribed by the Secretary, if, taking into account all the facts and circumstances, it is inequitable to hold the individual liable for any unpaid tax or any deficiency (or any portion of either) attributable to any item for which relief is not available under…”
Sophie A. Szopa v. United States, 453 F.3d 455 (7th Cir. 2006). “26 U.S.C. §§ 66 (c), 6015(b). The IRS affords an administrative opportunity to ask for such relief.”
Thomas v. Burke (In Re Burke), 150 B.R. 660 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 1993). · cites it 2× “See generally 26 U.S.C.A. § 66 (a) (West 1988 and Supp.”
David v. Idaho State Tax Comm'n, 230 P.3d 734 (Idaho 2010). · cites it 2× “The Parkers first argue that Idaho law should include the equivalent of 26 U.S.C. § 66 , entitled “Treatment of Community Income,” specifically section (c), which states: (c) Spouse relieved of liability in certain other cases Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, if—…”
Margaret Wiksell v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 90 F.3d 1459 (9th Cir. 1996). “1992) (under 26 U.S.C. § 66 (c), knowledge of omitted income determined with reference to knowledge of income-producing activity, not the amount of income produced); Price v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.