U.S. Code » Title 26 » Subtitle Subtitle K— Group Health Plan Requirements › Chapter CHAPTER 100— GROUP HEALTH PLAN REQUIREMENTS › Subchapter Subchapter C— General Provisions

26 U.S.C. § 9833

Regulations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 26 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary, consistent with section 104 of the Health Care Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, may promulgate such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this chapter. The Secretary may promulgate any interim final rules as the Secretary determines are appropriate to carry out this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2022 · leading case: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. Ct. 2367 (2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. Ct. 2367 (2020). · cites it 2× “§ 1191c ; 26 U.S.C. § 9833 . 2 The ACA exempts "grandfathered" plans from 42 U.”
State of California v. the Little Sisters of the Poor, 911 F.3d 558 (9th Cir. 2018). “26 U.S.C. § 9833 ; 29 U.S.C. § 1191c; 42 U.”
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. President United States, 930 F.3d 543 (3rd Cir. 2019). “26 U.S.C. § 9833 ; 29 U.S.C. § 1191c ; 42 U.”
Danny P. v. Catholic Health Initiatives, 891 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2018). “§ 1185a(g); see also 26 U.S.C. § 9833 ; 29 U.S.C. § 1191c; 42 U.”
Coalition for Parity, Inc. v. Sebelius, 709 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2010). “§ 1191c, 26 U.S.C. § 9833 (replacing “part” with “chapter”), and 42 U.”
California v. Health & Human Servs., 351 F. Supp. 3d 1267 (N.D. Cal. 2019). “First, the agencies cited 26 U.S.C. § 9833 , 29 U.S.C. § 1191c, and 42 U.”
Texas Med. Ass'n v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (E.D. Tex. 2022). “§ 300gg-92; 26 U.S.C. § 9833 ; 29 U.S.C. § 1191c). The APA allows a statute to modify or supersede its procedural requirements “to the extent [the statute] does so expressly.”
Nat'l Petrochemical & Refiners Ass'n v. Env't Prot. Agency, 643 F.3d 958 (D.C. Cir. 2011). “, 26 U.S.C. § 9833 . Or Congress could have used some combination of interim statutory rules and interim agency rules to meet its legislative goals with minimal delay.”
Coalition for Parity, Inc. v. Sebelius (D.D.C. 2010). “§ 1191c, 26 U.S.C. § 9833 (replacing “part” with “chapter”), and 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.