28 U.S.C. § 105

Missouri

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

Missouri is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri.

Eastern District

(a) The Eastern District comprises three divisions.

(1) The Eastern Division comprises the counties of Crawford, Dent, Franklin, Gasconade, Jefferson, Lincoln, Maries, Phelps, Saint Charles, Saint Francois, Saint Louis, Warren, and Washington, and the city of Saint Louis.

Court for the Eastern Division shall be held at Saint Louis.

(2) The Northern Division comprises the counties of Adair, Audrain, Chariton, Clark, Knox, Lewis, Linn, Macon, Marion, Monroe, Montgomery, Pike, Ralls, Randolph, Schuyler, Scotland, and Shelby.

Court for the Northern Division shall be held at Hannibal.

(3) The Southeastern Division comprises the counties of Bollinger, Butler, Cape Girardeau, Carter, Dunklin, Iron, Madison, Mississippi, New Madrid, Pemiscot, Perry, Reynolds, Ripley, Saint Genevieve, Scott, Shannon, Stoddard, and Wayne.

Court for the Southeastern Division shall be held at Cape Girardeau.

Western District

(b) The Western District comprises five divisions.

(1) The Western Division comprises the counties of Bates, Carroll, Cass, Clay, Henry, Jackson, Johnson, Lafayette, Ray, Saint Clair, and Saline.

Court for the Western Division shall be held at Kansas City.

(2) The Southwestern Division comprises the counties of Barton, Barry, Jasper, Lawrence, McDonald, Newton, Stone, and Vernon.

Court for the Southwestern Division shall be held at Joplin.

(3) The Saint Joseph Division comprises the counties of Andrew, Atchison, Buchanan, Caldwell, Clinton, Daviess, De Kalb, Gentry, Grundy, Harrison, Holt, Livingston, Mercer, Nodaway, Platte, Putnam, Sullivan, and Worth.

Court for the Saint Joseph Division shall be held at Saint Joseph.

(4) The Central Division comprises the counties of Benton, Boone, Callaway, Camden, Cole, Cooper, Hickory, Howard, Miller, Moniteau, Morgan, Osage, and Pettis.

Court for the Central Division shall be held at Jefferson City.

(5) The Southern Division comprises the counties of Cedar, Christian, Dade, Dallas, Douglas, Greene, Howell, Laclede, Oregon, Ozark, Polk, Pulaski, Taney, Texas, Webster, and Wright.

Court for the Southern Division shall be held at Springfield.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 59 cases (33 in the last 5 years), 1931–2026 · leading case: Alderwoods Grp., Inc. v. Reyvis Garcia, 682 F.3d 958 (11th Cir. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Alderwoods Grp., Inc. v. Reyvis Garcia, 682 F.3d 958 (11th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “1996) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 105 )) (internal quotation marks omitted)).”

Gwynn v. Walker (In Re Walker), 532 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2008). “The bankruptcy court found that sanctions were appropriate under two statutes, 28 U.S.C. §§ 105 , 1927, and its inherent authority to manage its affairs.”

Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. Kepner, 314 U.S. 44 (1941). · cites it 2× “§ 104 (suits for penalties and forfeitures); 28 U.S.C. § 105 (suits for recovery of taxes); 28 U.”

Ex Parte Collett, 337 U.S. 55 (1949). “For example, §§ 1394, 1395, 1396 and 1400, respectively, prescribe a new definition of appropriate forums for actions against the Comptroller of the Currency, involving fines and forfeitures, internal revenue taxes and patent and copyright suits; and the following statutes are…”

D & L Distrib., LLC v. Agxplore Int'l, LLC, 959 F. Supp. 2d 757 (E.D. Pa. 2013). “See 28 U.S.C. § 105 (a)(3). Accordingly, venue is proper in Missouri, and concurrent jurisdiction exists.”

United States v. Robert Hutchings, 835 F.2d 185 (8th Cir. 1988). “28 U.S.C. § 105 (b)(5). The USPC is located in Washington, D.”

United States v. Curtis Charles Overshon & John Overshon, 494 F.2d 894 (8th Cir. 1974). “28 U.S.C. § 105 (a) provides that Phelps County is within the Eastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri.”

Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co., 77 F. Supp. 425 (S.D.N.Y. 1948). “§§ 15, 22; Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 105 ; Copyright Actions, 17 U.”

Mooney v. Denver & R. G. W. R., 221 P.2d 628 (Utah 1950). “§ 104 (suits for penalties and forfeitures); 28 U.S.C.A. § 105 (suits for recovery of taxes); 28 U.”

United States v. Nat'l City Lines, Inc., 7 F.R.D. 456 (S.D. Cal. 1947). “’ ” 28 U.S.C.A. § 105 . The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has held that the doctrine of forum non conveniens is applicable to an action of this character.”

Johnson v. Burlington-N., Inc., 480 F. Supp. 259 (W.D. Mo. 1979). “28 U.S.C. § 105 (b)(3). Only an exceptional docket situation or some clear imbalance in convenience will justify an involuntary transfer within the district, over objection of a party represented by St.”

Thomas Cox v. United States, 373 F.2d 500 (8th Cir. 1967). ““Before we went to the M & L Cafe we were at ‘Dot’s Tavern’. I had been drinking beer and Jo Ann was drinking coffee.”

Show all 59 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.