28 U.S.C. § 106
Montana
Montana, exclusive of Yellowstone National Park, constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Billings, Butte, Glasgow, Great Falls, Havre, Helena, Kalispell, Lewistown, Livingston, Miles City, and Missoula.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1933–2013 · leading case: Lesser v. A-Z Associates (In Re Lion Capital Group)
Lesser v. A-Z Associates (In Re Lion Capital Group) (1985)
“28 U.S.C. § 106 , § 152 (1984). On the basis of similar controls alone, the Sixth Circuit ruled that bankruptcy courts acting under the Emergency Rule could constitutionally entertain core and related proceedings.”
Vagneur v. City of Aspen (2013)
“§ 4882 (2006); 28 U.S.C. §§ 106 , 302 (2006). T 7 In 1994, CDOT and FHWA, along with elected officials and staff from the City of Aspen and Pitkin County and members of the public, began to research and analyze various options to redesign the Entrance to Aspen.”
Fogel v. Department of Defense (2001)
“Accordingly, the C/MSRB found that the application of the Training Organization did not fulfill the second criteria, see 28 U.S.C. § 106 note (a)(2)(B). The C/MSRB found that, unlike members of the armed forces, members of the Maritime Service Training Organization were…”
Meacham Corp. v. United States (1953)
“The same provision was carried into § 45 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. § 106 . It was repealed, however, in the 1948 codification and now appears in Ch.”
Total Petroleum, Inc. v. Coral Petroleum, Inc. (In Re Coral Petroleum, Inc.) (1986)
“hdrawal of the reference of both core and related proceedings pursuant to § 157(c)(2), the opportunity for de novo review by the district court of related proceedings pursuant to § 157(c)(1), retention of the ability of the district court to enter final orders and judgments in…”
State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Volpe (1973)
“” 28 U.S.C. § 106 (a). On the basis of this approval, states are permitted to obligate the apportioned funds through the letting of construction contracts, etc.”
Samuels v. United States (1933)
“28 USCA § 106. The other errors assigned require no discussion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.