28 U.S.C. § 107
Nebraska
Nebraska constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Lincoln, North Platte, and Omaha.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1960–2021 · leading case: United States v. Stanko
United States v. Stanko (2008)
“rch 6, 2006, the day of his arraignment in this matter, Stanko, who proceeded pro se, filed the following: (1) a motion “to dismiss for wrong venue” because “[t]he crime is alleged to have occurred in the Western Division, not in the Omaha [Division;” 1 (2) a motion demanding…”
Hi Holdridge, A/K/A Hiram Holdridge, Larry Shumm and Neil Delmar Haworth v. United States (1960)
“Inasmuch as the entire State of Nebraska constitutes one judicial district, 28 U.S.C.A. § 107 , there is thus no question as to the proper allegation of venue in each Information.”
United States v. Stanko (2009)
“4 *873 Stanko alleges that he had ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to argue on direct appeal that Stanko “was forced to defend this ease in the wrong venue in violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights and his statutory right ( 28 U.S.C. § 107…”
Webb v. Franken (2021)
“” 28 U.S.C. § 107 . Plaintiff also incorrectly states that “there is no statute of limitations for civil rights violations.”
United States v. Rudolph Stanko (2008)
“rch 6, 2006, the day of his arraignment in this matter, Stanko, who proceeded pro se, filed the following: (1) a motion “to dismiss for wrong venue” because “[t]he crime is alleged to have occurred in the Western Division, not in the Omaha [D]ivision;”1 (2) a motion demanding…”
West v. Carpenter (2019)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 107 (establishing the State of Nebraska as one judicial district).”
Lightfeather v. City of Lincoln (2021)
“28 U.S.C. § 107 . Filing 29, request to add evidence (inmate request form).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.