28 U.S.C. § 1736

Congressional Journals

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

Extracts from the Journals of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and from the Executive Journal of the Senate when the injunction of secrecy is removed, certified by the Secretary of the Senate or the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall be received in evidence with the same effect as the originals would have.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1963–2025 · leading case: Magee v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Magee v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. (1963) calctapp “3 28 U.S.C.A. § 1736 : ‘ ‘ Extracts from the Journals of the Senate and the House of Representatives .”

Gundu v. Kalmadi (2025) mied “2001) (concluding that the facts averred in the plaintiff’s complaint “lacked the force and effect of an affidavit for purposes of responding to a motion for summary judgment” as it did not comply with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1736 ) (citing Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.”

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Franklin (2004) casd “2004); see also, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1736 (West 1994) (extracts from Journals of the Senate and House of Representatives); 28 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.