28 U.S.C. § 2505
Trial before judges
Any judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims may sit at any place within the United States to take evidence and enter judgment.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1972–2010 · leading case: Sabella v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
Sabella v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services (2009)
“Although the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims is not limited to a particular geographic area within the United States, see 28 U.S.C. § 2505 , the term “jurisdiction” in the context of establishing the lodestar, see Avera v.”
In Re United States (1989)
“The government moved for reconsideration, contending that the Claims Court was without statutory authority to schedule, attend or conduct any proceeding outside the territorial United States and that under 28 U.S.C. § 2505 (1982) it could only do so within the United States.”
Scott Timber, Inc. v. United States (2010)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 2505 (“Any judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims may sit at any place within the United States to take evidence and enter judgment.”
Melancon v. McKeithen (1972)
“28 U.S.C. § 2505 ; United States v. Sherwood, 1941, 312 U.”
Hoffland v. United States (1982)
“2d 930, 932 (1972); 28 U.S.C. § 2505 (1976). As to our jurisdiction over the underlying claim, the first principle to be applied is that our Tucker Act jurisdiction, 28 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.