U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART VI— PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS › Chapter CHAPTER 176— FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER B— PREJUDGMENT REMEDIES

28 U.S.C. § 3104

Garnishment

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)In General.—If the requirements of section 3101 are satisfied, a court may issue a writ of garnishment against property (excluding earnings) in which the debtor has a substantial nonexempt interest and which is in the possession, custody, or control of a person other than the debtor in order to satisfy a claim for a debt. Co-owned property shall be subject to garnishment to the same extent as co-owned property is subject to garnishment under the law of the State in which such property is located. A court may issue simultaneous separate writs of garnishment to several garnishees. A writ of garnishment issued under this subsection shall be continuing and shall terminate only as provided in section 3205(c)(10).(b)Writ.—(1) Subsections (b)(2) and (c) of section 3205 shall apply with respect to garnishment under this section, except that for purposes of this section—(A) earnings of the debtor shall not be subject to garnishment; and(B) a reference in such subsections to a judgment debtor shall be deemed to be a reference to a debtor.(2) The United States shall include in its application for a writ of garnishment—(A) the amount of the claim asserted by the United States for a debt; and(B) the date the writ is issued.(c)Limitation.—The value of property garnished shall not exceed the amount by which the sum of the amount of the debt claimed by the United States and the amount of interest and costs reasonably likely to be assessed against the debtor by the court exceeds the aggregate value of the nonexempt interest of the debtor in any—(1) property securing the debt; and(2) property attached or in receivership, or income sequestered, under this subchapter.(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, § 3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4945.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2021 · leading case: Buchwald Capital Advisors, LLC v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (In Re Greektown Holdings, LLC)
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Buchwald Capital Advisors, LLC v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (In Re Greektown Holdings, LLC) (2019) ca6 · cites it 2× “, Fair Debt Collection Procedures Act of 1990, 28 U.S.C. §§ 3104 , 3250, 3002(7), 3002(10) (authorizing suits against an “Indian tribe”); USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005, 18 U.”
Murungi v. Texas Guaranteed (2010) laed “The FDCPA does not provide for the prejudgment garnishment of earnings, see 28 U.S.C. § 3104 (a), (b)(1)(A); compare 28 U.”
National Labor Relations Board v. E.D.P. Medical Computer Systems, Inc. (1993) ca2 “On November 30,1992, the Board made an ex parte application for a prejudgment writ of garnishment under the FDCPA, 28 U.S.C. § 3104 , in the Eastern District of New York.”
United States v. Susan Pioch (2021) ca6 “28 U.S.C. §§ 3104 ; 3205. Because the Government applied postjudgment to garnish two of Pioch’s accounts, § 3011(a) applies here.”
United States v. Susan Pioch (2021) ca6 “28 U.S.C. §§ 3104 ; 3205. Because the Government applied postjudgment to garnish two of Pioch’s accounts, § 3011(a) applies here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.