28 U.S.C. § 353
Special committees
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case: In re Charges of Judicial Misconduct
In re Charges of Judicial Misconduct (2006)
“Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 353 (a) and Local Rule 9, Chief Judge John M.”
In re Charges of Judicial Misconduct (2014)
“On July 19, 2013, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 353 (a) and Judicial-Conduct Rules 11(f) and 12, Chief Judge Garland of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit appointed a Special Committee to consider the allegations of the Complaint.”
In Re Opinion of Judicial Conference Committee to Review Circuit Council Conduct and Disability Orders (2006)
“We therefore conclude that under the scheme of the statute, this Committee has no jurisdiction to review a judicial council’s order if the chief judge has not appointed a special committee under 28 U.S.C. § 353 . Although we believe there is much to commend in the opinion of our…”
In Re Committee on Judicial Conduct (2008)
“16, 2006); and Report to the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit from the Committee Convened Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 353 (a) to Investigate the Allegations of Judicial Misconduct in the Complaints Docketed Under 05-89097 and 04-89039, Pertaining to Complaint 05-89097 (Oct.”
In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct (2009)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 353 (a)(1); Rule 11(f). The members of the Special Committee were: Chief Judge Scirica, presiding; Marjorie O.”
In re Opinion of Judicial Conference Committee (2006)
“We therefore conclude that under the scheme of the statute, this Committee has no jurisdiction to review a judicial council’s order if the chief judge has not appointed a special committee under 28 U.S.C. § 353 . Although we believe there is much to commend in the opinion of our…”
Newman v. Moore (2024)
“See 28 U.S.C. §§ 353 (a), (c). Judge Newman declined to cooperate with the investigation, however, objecting especially to the committee’s requests that she undergo independent neurological testing and provide it relevant medical records.”
In re Charges of Judicial Misconduct (2014)
“2 On July 19, 2013, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 353 (a) and Judicial-Conduct Rules 11(f) and 12, Chief Judge Garland of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit appointed a Special Committee to consider the allegations of the Complaint.”
Newman v. Moore (2024)
“” 28 U.S.C. § 353 (c). This count therefore boils down to an allegation that, in ordering Judge Newman to undergo a medical examination and produce medical records, the Special Committee acted beyond the scope of its § 353(c) authority.”
Dreiling v. United States (2026)
“§ 354 (a)(2)(A)(i) (outlining the actions that the judicial council can take upon receiving a complaint against a judge under 28 U.S.C. § 353 ). The show cause order also directed Mr.”
IN RE: Complaint of Judicial Misconduct (2009)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 353 (a)(1); Rule 11(f). The members of the Special Committee were: Chief Judge Scirica, presiding; Marjorie O.”
In re Committee on Judicial Conduct & Disability (2008)
“16, 2006); and Report to the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit from the Committee Convened Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 353 (a) to Investigate the Allegations of Judicial Misconduct in the Complaints Docketed Under 05-89097 and 04-89039, Pertaining to Complaint 05-89097 (Oct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.