28 U.S.C. § 530
Payment of travel and transportation expenses of newly appointed special agents
The Attorney General or the Attorney General’s designee is authorized to pay the travel expenses of newly appointed special agents and the transportation expenses of their families and household goods and personal effects from place of residence at time of selection to the first duty station, to the extent such payments are authorized by section 5723 of title 5 for new appointees who may receive payments under that section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1999–2023 · leading case: Stephenson v. United States
Stephenson v. United States (2003)
“Defendant Actors McKay, Wszalek, and Odulio with the assistance of Defendants Holm, Cowley and Hardaway in willful and knowingly violation of 28 U.S.C. § 530 (B) in a malicious attempt to obtain bogus indictments against the Plaintiffs for the purpose of malicious prosecution in…”
United States v. Lowery (1999)
“2681 (1998) (to be codified at 28 U.S.C. § 530 (b)) (“An attorney for the Government shall be subject to State laws and rules, and local Federal court rules, governing attorneys in each State where such attorney engages in that attorney’s duties, to the same extent and in the…”
United States v. Parker (2001)
“)) (violation of state bar rule of professional conduct, prohibiting attorney inducements to witnesses, provides no basis for application of federal exclusionary rule and holding 28 U.S.C. § 530 (B), subjecting government attorneys to state rules of professional conduct,…”
Neville v. Classic Gardens (2001)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 530 (b) (“An attorney for the Government shall be subject to State laws and rules, and local Federal court rules, governing attorneys in each State where such attorney engages in that attorney’s duties, to the same extent and in the same manner as other attorneys…”
Viola v. Ohio Attorney General (2021)
“) Viola further argues that 28 U.S.C. § 530 (B)(a) “provides that all federal attorneys are subject to the same state laws and rules, as well as local federal court rules, that govern attorneys in the state where the attorney practices.”
Cox v. McCarthy (2023)
“; and (7) 28 U.S.C. § 530 . See id. at 3 . Defendant argues that Plaintiff fails to state a plausible claim under Fed.”
High Wolf v. United States (2020)
“High Wolf also filed an ex parte motion asking the court to appoint a special master “to resolve issues pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 530 (B), known as the Citizens Protection Act of 1998.”
United States v. Lowery (1999)
“2681 (1998) (to be codified at 28 U.S.C. § 530 (b)) (“An attorney for the Government shall be subject to State laws and rules, and local Federal court rules, governing attorneys in each State where such attorney engages in that attorney’s duties, to the same extent and in the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.