28 U.S.C. § 609
Courts’ appointive power unaffected
The authority of the courts to appoint their own administrative or clerical personnel shall not be limited by any provisions of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1938–2021 · leading case: E. Robert Nigro, Jr. v. John Sullivan, Warden
E. Robert Nigro, Jr. v. John Sullivan, Warden (1994)
“; and 28 U.S.C. §§ 609 and 510. See 28 C.F.R. § 542 (1993).”
United States v. Andre M. Millings (1976)
“, Rule 609, 28 U.S.C.A. § 609 , 88 Stat. 1935 . We think it was not.”
Helen Guercio v. George Brody, John Feikens (1989)
“28 U.S.C. § 609 (1982). In this connection, 28 U.”
Goldhaber v. Foley (1981)
“28 U.S.C. § 609 . 10 . Cf. 28 U.S.C. § 771 (a) (“Based on need each bankruptcy court may appoint a clerk who shall be subject to removal only by the court”); 28 U.”
Vincennes Steel Corporation v. Miller (1938)
“” 28 U.S. C.A. § 609. However, this statute relates only to the procedure for recovering fees, and does not purport to impose any new obligation or to change the right or obligations of the parties.”
E.D.S. Federal Corp. v. United States (1983)
“Such a splitting of causes of action, permitted by the CDA, supra, brought into play 28 U.S.C. § 609 (d), which provides: If two or more suits arising from one contract are filed in the Court of Claims and one or more agency boards, for the convenience of parties or witnesses or…”
Mar-Tex Realization Corporation v. Wolfson (1944)
“reasons why such aid may be quite necessary for quick and effective action; otherwise the estate of a debt- or in reorganization at a distance may well be secreted or destroyed before effective process may be obtained, and the machinery for its operation, with appropriate…”
Schroeder v. Polk (1993)
“Thus, a suit against “The United States Probation Office” is, in effect, a suit against the United States Courts, a branch of the United States government.”
MATRAJT v. THE UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (2021)
“§ 3602 (a) and 28 U.S.C. § 609 . They are employed by the United States Courts and are under the administrative control of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.