28 U.S.C. § 9
AUTHORITY OF INSPECTORS GENERAL.
“[Enacted section 11298 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.]”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case: Staten v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2020).
Staten v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2020). “6), Petitioner’s motion to compel under 28 U.S.C. § 9 (Mot. to Compel, Dkt. No. 7) and Petitioner’s motion to overturn DHO finding.”
Dominique Merriman v. State of California (C.D. Cal. 2019). “Merriman I: CV 17-8303 7 On November 6, 2017, Petitioner constructively filed a Petition for Writ of 8 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 9 2254, before this Court in Merriman I.”
Dominique Merriman v. State of California (C.D. Cal. 2020). “Merriman I: CV 17-8303 7 On November 6, 2017, Petitioner constructively filed a Petition for Writ of 8 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 9 2254, before this Court in Merriman I.”
Wesley Arvin Seals v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (C.D. Cal. 2020). “§ 2412 (d) 6 7 Before the Court is the Stipulation of Plaintiff, Wesley Alvin Seals, for 8 award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 9 10 2412(d). Based on the pleadings as well as the position of the defendant 11 commissioner, if any, and…”
United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Drive Plan., LLC (N.D. Ga. 2025). “Edwards resides in the Gainesville division of the district, 28 U.S.C. § 9 (a)(1), but Ms. Edwards did not object to proceeding in the Atlanta division, and the Court would find venue appropriate in the Atlanta division anyway based on the pendency of the receivership as…”
Miller & Holguin v. Decora Indus., Inc. (In re Decora Indus., Inc.), 268 B.R. 63 (D. Del. 2001). “On October 24, 2000, Decora requested that the Ohio District Court confirm the Arbitration Award and enter judgment pursuant thereto under 28 U.S.C. §§ 9 and 10. On or about December 4, 2000, judgment was entered with respect to the Arbitration Award in the Ohio District Court.”
Lujan v. Girardi/Keese (D. Guam 2009). “” 28 U.S.C. § 9 636(b)(1)(C) (2005); see Baxter v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.