U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART III— COURT OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES › Chapter CHAPTER 57— GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO COURT OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES

28 U.S.C. § 958

Persons ineligible as receivers

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

A person holding any civil or military office or employment under the United States or employed by any justice or judge of the United States shall not at the same time be appointed a receiver in any case in any court of the United States.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 2000–2020 · leading case: Netsphere, Inc. v. Baron
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Netsphere, Inc. v. Baron (2012) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 958 . The trustee pointed out that a special master is neither an employee of the United States nor of the judge who appointed him.”
United States v. Quintana-Aguayo (2000) ca1 “See 28 U.S.C. § 958 . 8 . See Consolidated Rail Corp.”
United States v. Melot (Billy) (2014) ca10 “They rely on 28 U.S.C. § 958 , which prohibits a person employed by the federal government from being appointed a receiver in a federal court case.”
Gardner v. Larkin (2020) rid “SRA Augusta SPE, LLC, 1:16-cv-00410- JDL, 2016 WL 6808132 , at *4 n.”
Netsphere, Incorporated v. Jeffrey Baron (2012) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 958 . The trustee pointed out that a special master is neither an employee of the United States nor of the judge who appointed him.”
Netsphere, Inc. v. Jeffrey Baron (2012) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 958 . The trustee pointed out that a special master is neither an employee of the United States nor of the judge who appointed him.”
Netsphere, Inc. v. Jeffrey Baron (2012) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 958 . The trustee pointed out that a special master is neither an employee of the United States nor of the judge who appointed him.”
Netsphere, Inc. v. Jeffrey Baron (2012) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 958 . The trustee pointed out that a special master is neither an employee of the United States nor of the judge who appointed him.”
Netsphere, Inc. v. Jeffrey Baron (2012) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 958 . The trustee pointed out that a special master is neither an employee of the United States nor of the judge who appointed him.”
Netsphere, Inc. v. Jeffrey Baron (2012) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 958 . The trustee pointed out that a special master is neither an employee of the United States nor of the judge who appointed him.”
Netsphere, Inc. v. Jeffrey Baron (2012) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 958 . The trustee pointed out that a special master is neither an employee of the United States nor of the judge who appointed him.”
Netsphere, Inc. v. Jeffrey Baron (2012) ca5 “” 28 U.S.C. § 958 . The trustee pointed out that a special master is neither an employee of the United States nor of the judge who appointed him.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.