29 U.S.C. § 1
This Act may be cited as the ‘Veterans’ Job Training Act’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1942–2025 · leading case: Int'l Painters & Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. Auxier Drywall, LLC, 531 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D.D.C. 2008).
Int'l Painters & Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. Auxier Drywall, LLC, 531 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D.D.C. 2008). “51 in late charges for late payments made from November 2006 through December 2006 pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1 132(g)(2)(E). Plaintiff has also requested attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 29 U.”
Gonzalez Villanueva v. Warner Lambert, 339 F. Supp. 2d 351 (D.P.R. 2004). “29 U.S.C. § 1 132(a)(3)(B). This provision permits relief against a plan administrator for breaches of the fiduciary duties imposed by ERISA.”
Robert F. Kennedy Med. Ctr. v. Belshe, 919 P.2d 721 (Cal. 1996). “) The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor (see 29 U.S.C. §§ 1 , 2) calculates consumer and producer price indices monthly or annually.”
Torres-Negron v. Ramallo Bros. Printing, Inc., 203 F. Supp. 2d 120 (D.P.R. 2002). “29 U.S.C. § 1 166(a)(2). The administrator then has fourteen days to notify the qualified beneficiary of his/her right to continue coverage.”
Iowa City Cmty. Sch. Dist. v. Iowa City Educ. Ass'n, 343 N.W.2d 139 (Iowa 1983). “29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 to 157, Explanation at V (West 1973).”
Kathryn Strom v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. & Goldman, Sachs & Co. Supplemental Life Ins. Plan, 202 F.3d 138 (2d Cir. 1999). “Moreover, there is far more direct evidence of the types of remedies that Congress regarded as equitable when it enacted ERISA, for the statute was not created in a vacuum.”
Chindarah v. Pick Up Stix, Inc., 14 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1763 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “) The Chindarah plaintiffs urge us to look at the law under the Federal Labor Standards Act (FLSA) ( 29 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.), pointing out that the FLSA has been interpreted as prohibiting employers from obtaining releases of wage claims directly from employees, including claims…”
Schoemann Ex Rel. Schoemann v. Excellus Health Plan, Inc., 447 F. Supp. 2d 1000 (D. Minnesota 2006). “Excellus argues that venue does not lie in the District of Minnesota under ERISA’s venue provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1 132(e)(2). Excel-lus further argues that, even if venue does lie in Minnesota, the action should nevertheless be transferred to New York pursuant to the Plan’s…”
Watson v. Deaconess Waltham Hosp., 141 F. Supp. 2d 145 (D. Mass. 2001). “The legislative history of ERISA, when viewed in light of the parallel history of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, now codified at 42 U.”
Bolduc v. Nat'l Semiconductor Corp., 35 F. Supp. 2d 106 (D. Me. 1998). “In his Complaint, Bolduc alleges that Nation *109 al violated the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 1 (“FLSA”), and Maine’s state counterpart to this law, 26 M.”
Trs. of the Sheet Metal Workers' Local Union No. 80 Pension Trust Fund v. Cooling, 555 F. Supp. 2d 838 (E.D. Mich. 2008). “2d at 113 , and 29 U.S.C. § 1 104(a)(1) makes clear (“a fiduciary shall discharge his duties with respect to a plan solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries”), plan administrators do not owe fiduciary duties to employers, only to participants and…”
Holland v. Acl Transp. Servs., LLC, 815 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2011). “” 29 U.S.C. § 1 132(e)(2); see also Int’l Bhd.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.